Chapter One Introduction
Background
When the financial crisis hit the United States (U.S.), other developed countries were also affected, including Japan and the United Kingdom (UK), which catapulted the global financial crisis. Since many developing countries export to and do business with these affected nations, their economies were adversely impacted, as well (Humala 2009). One of these distressed economies is the Turkish economy, which is still recovering from the market problems that occurred in 2001, due to the terrorist actions in the U.S. (Daloglu 2008). The Turkish Justice and Development Party (AKP)-led government created a stimulus package, made mostly of temporary indirect tax cuts, to advance the economy and it also obtained financial aid from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.3). On the other hand, the Central Bank of Turkey decreased its overnight borrowing rate much more swiftly than formerly anticipated, from 16.75 in October 2008 to 10.5 in March 2009, the lowest level after the 2001 financial crisis (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.7). These efforts, however, could not contain the impact of global competition that exerts its burden on the Turkish economy and the increasingly competitive global textile industry (Tatoglu  Demirbag 2008).

1.2 Problem definition
Despite these monetary and fiscal policies, the Turkish economy continued to contract from 2007 to 2009. In 2008, real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth decreased from 4.82 in 2007 to 1.12 in 2008 (Euromonitor 2009). By 2009, real GDP growth became -6.50 (Euromonitor 2009). The textile industry also plummeted, as industrial production diminished by 21 in total (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). The Turkish textile industry is critical to the economy of Turkey, because textile companies composes 18 of the total companies in Turkey and annual production value of the sector is 30 billion USD (Parlak et al. 2009, p.184). The Turkish textile sector is also the 5th largest supplier in the world and 2nd largest supplier to European Union (Parlak et al. 2009, p.184). If the Turkish textile sector significantly contracts, this will greatly negatively impact the economy. To compound these problems, Turkey battles political issues, as part of its military-led historical development into a republic, and it also has issues regarding its EU accession and IMF grants (Abramowitz  Barkey 2009 Birch 2009 Economist Intelligence Unit 2009). These political concerns complicate the impacts of the global financial crisis. There is a need for further examination, on how the Turkish government and private sector, and even regional organisations, can work together in finding immediate and long-term solutions to the weakening Turkey economy and textile industry.

Research aims and objectives
This dissertation aims to identify the effects of the 2008 global financial crisis on Turkey and the Turkish textile industry, in particular. The research aims and objectives are the following.

1.4 Chapter summaries
This dissertation begins with the review of literature. The literature review includes an exploration of the four management models- knowledge management model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Innovation ecology, and Business responsibility, and how they can undermine or reinforce the impacts of the 2008 global recession. It is followed by the chapters on results and discussion. The results chapter compiles the results of secondary research. The discussion section explores the answers to the research aims. The final chapter consists of the conclusion and the recommendations. The conclusion summarises findings and links results with the conceptual models in the review of literature. The recommendations are for the government and textile firms, so that they can collaborate with each other in forming a more competitive industrial and national performance.

Chapter Two Literature review
2.1 Introduction
This literature review discusses the concepts that are involved in the four management models that will be used for this paper- knowledge management model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Innovation ecology, and Business responsibility. The review of literature indicates the importance of knowledge management, business responsibility, and innovation to the competitiveness of firms and the Turkish economy, as a whole, wherein if they contribute to the competitiveness of the Turkish industries, this can decrease the impact of the 2008 global financial crisis. There is, nonetheless, a gap in understanding the competitiveness of the Turkish industry with respect to other nations, which this paper can no longer cover.

2.2 Impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis
The 2008 global financial crisis demonstrated how developing economies have been increasingly dependent on the economies of First World countries, for imports, exports, and how they are deeply interconnected through the channels of interest rate and exchange rate (Subrahmanyam 2009, pp.36-37). The Turkish economy decreased by 6.2 in the fourth quarter of 2008, which cut GDP growth to only 1.1 for the whole 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8).  See Figure 1. The negative GDP continued in 2009, with negative growth rate, -5.90. The constrained domestic bank lending, inadequate foreign capital inflows and frail external demand contributed to the economy contraction from 2008 to 2009. In 2010, an economic think-thank predicted that GDP growth will improve to a modest 1, but this will rely on the incremental improvements of the credit conditions and a more secure exchange rate (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8).  Demand in Turkeys primary European export markets is still forecasted to remain frail in 2010, because of the 2008 global financial crisis that has affected global exports industries across Europe and the rest of the world (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8).

Figure 1 Gross domestic product by expenditure
(TL m at constant 1998 prices where series are indicated otherwise  change year on year)

Figure 1 also shows drops in private consumption from 2008 to 2010. Public consumption also decreased from 2008 to 2009, and so total domestic demand sharply drops for the same timeframe (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8).  Export expenditures drop from 2007 to 2008, although a larger fall is seen from 2008 to 2009 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8). The impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis are evidently extended to 2010, with 2010 expenditures not showing the same figures as 2007.

Because of the abrupt economic slowdown in Turkey and decreases in international commodity prices, inflation reached 10.43 in 2008, compared to 8.78 in 2007 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8). Inflation rate decreased, however, in 2009, at 6.28 due to the inflationary effects of the sharp slide in the value of the lira since early October 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.8).

The high increase in risk aversion that came with the 2008 global credit crisis in September-October 2008 pushed the Turkish lira to depreciate from an average of TL1.24US1 (TL1.78 1) in September to about TL1.70US1 (TL2.10  1) in late October (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.9). The price volatility in 2009 depreciated lira further to YL 1.56.

Low import demand and lower commodity prices lessened the Turkey s current-account deficit from about US42bn, or 5.7 of GDP, in 2008 to about 67 in 2009. The smaller deficit in 2009-10 should help to decrease the  burdens of external financing pressure as the global credit problems made it harder to promote international financing than before the global financial crisis in 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.10). Hence, it can be seen that the economy of Turkey has been affected by the 2008 crisis, through a direct impact on the GDP, lira value, inflation rate, and public and private expenditure.

2.3 Relationship between Knowledge management and the 2008 Global financial crisis
This sub-section discusses the knowledge management model, beginning with the conceptualization of knowledge, and then followed by the exploration of its internal processes and external advantages. It also links knowledge management with dealing with the 2008 global financial crisis

2.3.1 Knowledge
Few firms understand and invest in knowledge management, especially when they do not value human resources as sources of distinct knowledge. Those who do employ knowledge management can improve and have improved their competitiveness in this information-driven society (Hansen et al., 1999 Nayir  Uzuncarsili 2008, p.142 See Appendix A). Davenport and Prusak (1998) explain knowledge as a fluid mix of framed experience, important values, contextual information, and expert insight that provides a framework for evaluation and incorporation of new experiences and information (cited in Danskin et al. 2005, p.92). Polanyi (1966) highlights the definition of knowledge as the blood for effective action.

It is often heard from companies that their employees are one of their greatest assets, because of the knowledge they bring to the organisations (Crook et al. 2008 Halley  Beaulieu 2005). Several scholars attest that knowledge exceeds in importance, compared to other physical properties (Spender 1996 Grant and Baden-Fuller 1995 Grant 1997, cited in Nayir  Uzuncarsili 2008, p.142), including natural resources and finance (Quinn et al. 1996 Martinez 1998 Numri 1998, cited in Nayir  Uzuncarsili 2008, p.142). It is because finance and natural resources can be accessed by anyone, but valuable knowledge can be limited to organisations and its people (Guillot  Lincoln 2005).

2.3.2 Knowledge and the 2007 global financial crisis
Knowledge can be seen as strategic source of competitiveness, which can reduce the impact of the 2008 global financial crisis. Though there are no existing studies that makes this direct link, Piggott (2008) indicated that the strength of Turkish financial sector came from the strong government reforms made after Turkeys catastrophic banking failure of 2001. This reaction to the 2001 financial crisis is considered as a form of knowledge, which strengthened the banking sector when the 2008 global financial crisis hit Turkey. Piggott (2008) highlights that The wisdom of government regulations that were once deemed overly strict is now apparent. While international banks are struggling to keep regulatory capital ratios above the 8 minimum, the Turkish banking sector has an enviable capital adequacy ratio of 17. Because of the knowledge gained from the previous crisis, the banking sectors stringent policies enabled it to be financially prepared, because it has high banking assets

2.3.3 Knowledge management and internal processes
The value of developing knowledge within the firm relies on the organisations ability to scrutinise and take up newly made knowledge from numerous sources and then to incorporate this knowledge into its present knowledge base (Cohen  Levinthal 1990 Hamel 1991, cited in Danskin et al. 2005, p.93). Hence, companies must organise and administer existing knowledge. This can be referred as managing organisational memory, wherein the latter is described as the the means by which knowledge from the past is brought to bear on present activities, thus resulting in higher or lower levels of organisational effectiveness (Stein 1995, cited in Danskin et al. 2005, p.93).

Given these advantages of knowledge management, this section proceeds to a knowledge management model. Danskin et al. (2005) present a proactive knowledge management model that do not only cut costs and cycle time, but also develops knowledge for predictive management purposes (p.96). See Figure 2. It can be seen from this figure that the knowledge management interconnects the whole value chain stakeholders, so that the company can choose from the firm strategy of cost leadership or differentiation leadership. This model will be useful in analysing the Turkish economy and the textile industry and providing theoretically sound recommendations.
Figure 2 Knowledge management model
Source Danskin et al. (2005, p.96)

2.4 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
2.4.1 Porters diamond of competitive advantage
In order to understand the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Porters diamond of competitive advantage must also be discussed. Porters model provides the theoretical basis for the AHP (Danskin et al. 2005, p.97 Shafaei 2009).  Porters (1980) generic business strategies are commonly used frameworks for determining channels to competitive advantage within an industry. Two such strategies are applicable to the apparel and textile industry 1) A cost leadership strategy, wherein the firm concentrates on factors that allows it to complete and uphold low per unit costs and 2) A differentiation strategy, which requires making a different image or value for a product or service, whether they are true or imagined (Danskin et al. 2005, p.97).  In addition, the review of literature shows that the Porters framework of generic strategies provides the insight that the American textile and apparel industry pursues one of these differentiation strategies 1) Market-based differentiation where an organisation seeks to set itself apart from the competition primarily through product positioning or 2) Innovation-based differentiation where the organisation attempts to differentiate itself through innovative application of technology to meet customer needs (Danskin et al. 2005, p.97).  The first mode is more common in the U.S., but not in the Turkish textile industry that has weak innovation and technology in textile compared to other countries (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009).

2.4.2 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is first used by Saaty (1980), which concerns structuring multiple-choice criteria into a hierarchy, assessing the relative importance of these criteria, comparing alternatives for each and determining an overall ranking of the alternatives (Shafaei 2009, p.24). Based on this study, the weaknesses of the AHP are the ratings of the constitutive element for each index, which rely on the subjective beliefs of experts (Shafaei 2009, p.24). In addition, the interviewees are presumed to have the same level of confidence for all the pair wise comparison (Zahedi 1996 Yang  Lee 1997, cited in Shafaei 2009, p.24). This means that the effectiveness of AHP relies on the constancy of the data gathered from experts on pair wise comparisons of the criteria (Shafaei 2009, p.24). Sirikrai and Tang (2005) also used an AHP-based model to investigate the degrees of significance of indicators of industrial competition (cited in Shafaei 2009, p.24). The results show that AHP can be used to assess the competitive performance of competing companies. Chang et al. (2006) expanded a hierarchical arrangement for identifying the factors that shape the competitiveness of a firm (cited in Shafaei 2009, p.24).  These factors are connected to the sources of competitiveness for the Porters diamond of competitive advantage. Their findings showed that AHP can be used as a valid approach for evaluating the competitiveness of firms and they also named weaknesses that Saaty (1980) also noted. The importance of these articles is that they applied AHP for competitiveness assessment and they also identified the weaknesses of the model.

2.5 Innovation ecology
Competitiveness can also be derived from innovation, as many firms can show. This sub-section discusses innovation as a concept and components of innovation ecology.

2.5.1 Innovation
Innovation is defined as
the ability to develop products to meet the needs of market, 2) the ability to use existing technology to develop products, 3) the ability to develop new products or update existing products to meet the needs of markets, and 4) the ability to acquire new technology to create new opportunities. (Liao et al. 2009, p.161).

This definition covers the customer-centricity of innovation, as well as the abilities and resources needed to create new products. Liao et al. (2009) studied the link between innovation and knowledge management, and they concluded that knowledge acquisition is positively related to innovation capability.

2.5.2 Components of innovation ecology
Mark Stefik, Research Fellow and Manager of the Information Sciences and Technologies Laboratory at the Palo Alto Research Center in California said We live and work in . . . an innovation ecology, a collection of people and organisations whose joint contributions make breakthroughs possible. It includes universities, government funders, venture capitalists, designers, marketing departments, and corporate labs. The challenge is to bring ideas together. Studies described innovation ecology as an environment comprising interconnected institutions, laws, and policies that create an innovation infrastructure that includes education, research, tax policy, and protection of intellectual capital.

2.5.3 Innovation and the 2008 global financial crisis
Innovation can also undermine the negative economic impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis. Kocak and Zeytinli (2009) stressed the importance of technological goods and development for welfare nations like Turkey. Though it does not make the concrete connection between innovation and the 2008 global financial crisis, this article indicates that technological goods and development during economic difficulties can greatly improve the economic conditions of Turkey, even as the 2008 global financial crisis affects it.

2.6 Business responsibility at macro and micro levels
This sub-section discusses corporate social responsibility and national responsibility. It also makes connections between competitiveness and business responsibility.

2.6.1 Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) describes business practices that adhere to ethical values that comply with legal requirements, that demonstrate respect for individuals, and that promote the betterment of the community at large and the environment (Herciu  Ogrean 2008, p.1232 See Appendix B). It involves managing business through policies, systems, and practices that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal and public expectations that society has of business (Greenberg  Baron 2008, cited in Herciu  Ogrean 2008, p.1232). CSR links business competitiveness and stakeholder needs in order to promote holistic solutions (Jones et al., 2007 Sachs et al. 2006). See Figure 3. This figure shows that business principles, key performance indicators (KPI) and CSR projects must be aligned. See also Appendix B which compares CSR models. These articles show that CSR can be linked to competitiveness, which can be resistant to poor economic conditions, or improve chances of better performance, once the economy recovers.

2.6.2 Business responsibility and the 2008 global financial crisis
Hortacsu and Ozkan Gunay (2008) stressed from their study that ethical behaviour is crucial to the proper functioning of the banking sector. Ethical behaviour considers diverse stakeholders, which can improve the competitiveness of the banking sector. When there are problems with ethics, on the other hand, there will be more problems during the financial crisis, because of litigation problems.
Figure 3 CSR and stakeholders perspective

Source Sachs et al. (2006, p.507)
2.6.3 National responsibility
There is a connection between national performance and competitiveness of firms, and this can be within the context of CSR (Herciu  Ogrean 2008, p.1233). Chan and Al-Hawamdeh (2002) studied the position of Singaporean government in expanding e-commerce and the impact of e-commerce on the Singaporean society. The Singaporean government conducted projects to make its country the next information and knowledge gateway (Chan  Al-Hawamdeh 2002, p.279). Because of these government projects, many small, medium, and large companies have employed e-commerce to maintain or even become important parts of their operations (Chan  Al-Hawamdeh 2002, p.284 Molla  Licker 2005, p.104). These articles show the link between national responsibility and competitiveness.

2.6.4 Competitiveness and responsibility during the 2008 global financial crisis
Herciu and Ogrean (2008) studied CSR at macro and micro levels. Findings showed that Even if national performance increases, the firm does not succeed to maintain itself to a specific level but on the contrary the firms global performance decreases (p.1242). These results contradict the general findings of ). Chan and Al-Hawamdeh (2002) and Molla and Licker (2005). Nonetheless, Herciu and Ogrean (2008) indicate that it is also important for companies to practice CSR, even when the country lacks the same responsibility platform. Business responsibility helped the financial sector weather the 2008 global financial crisis, because of the readiness to extend stricter policies.

Chapter Three Research methods
3.1 Research design
This section discusses the research design of this dissertation.
 
3.1.1 Secondary research
This dissertation involves secondary research. It synthesises the works of articles, books, and newspapers on Turkish economy and textile sector. Secondary research is preferred over primary research, because there is already a great deal of information about the Turkish economy and its textile industry, and it will be more meaningful for this paper to synthesise findings and analyse them according to four theoretical models.

3.1.2 Qualitative versus quantitative research
This research combines qualitative and quantitative research designs, because it uses statistics done by other studies, as well as in-depth information conducted by qualitative articles. The triangulation of the research design can improve the validity of the data, because of the combination of in-depth and statistical measures that can help this paper attain its research objectives. Fielding and Schreier (2001) discuss the relevance of triangulation to research. An article provides a good understanding of triangulation

What is involved in triangulation is not the combination of different kinds of data per se, but rather an attempt to relate different sorts of data in such a way as to counteract various possible threats to the validity of (their) analysis (Hammersley  Atkinson 1983, p.199, cited in Fielding  Schreier 2001, online).

Triangulating data collection methods and analysis involves multiple methods and theoretical frameworks, which help lessen the weaknesses in validity and reliability of using only either a quantitative or a qualitative research design (Fielding  Schreier 2001). In other words, this dissertation does not only ask how the textile economy is affected, but how workers also lived through this experience, which qualitative research can also answer (Newman  Benz, 1998, p.14).

In addition, a strong value of triangulation is not that it promises the validity of conclusions, but because it provokes in researchers a more critical, even sceptical, stance towards their data (Fielding  Schreier 2001). Qualitative research is often criticised as providing benign conclusions that are based on common sense. It is also criticised as lacking empirical basis, because it cannot generalise from present theories (Thitart 2001, p.80). Quantitative research, on the other hand, is grounded on the positivist paradigm (Thitart 2001, p.81). It can be less inflexible than the qualitative research design, especially as emerging information is gathered. Through triangulation, however, analyses are questioned, and the proneness to ethnographic authority is decreased (Hammersley  Atkinson 1983, cited in Fielding  Schreier 2001), wherein the qualitative researchers can only defend their findings, because they were there.

Triangulation, on the contrary, allows qualitative work to guide quantitative research in developing a theoretical framework, validating survey data, interpreting statistical findings and improving the analysis of sophisticated responses, choosing survey items to construct indices, and providing case study examples (Fielding  Schreier 2001 Thitart 2001, p.81).  In some cases, the theoretical system can be derived also from experiences of involved stakeholders. For Sieber (1979), quantitative data can be employed to determine individuals for qualitative study and to demarcate representative and non-representative conditions and participants (cited in Fielding  Schreier 2001). Sieber adds that in terms of data analysis, quantitative data can mitigate the holistic fallacy that all dimensions of a situation are congruent, and can show how some situations can also be general (cited in Fielding  Schreier 2001). Quantitative data cover wide ranges of nuances that qualitative data can also miss (Newman  Benz, 1998, p.13 Thitart 2001, p.81).

In triangulation, data is connected from different sources, which is aligned with relativistic epistemology, one that acknowledges the value of knowledge from numerous sources, rather than to focus only on one source of knowledge and take that source as the ideal or best sour (Fielding  Schreier 2001). Triangulation allows for continuous data analysis process, creating fewer constraints on data interpretation and provides more leeway of seeing information from diverse theoretical lenses (Groeben  Rustemeyer 1994). These are the justifications for the research design used.

3.2 Potential alternatives
The potential alternatives to the triangulation method are using either a qualitative method or a quantitative method. For the qualitative research method, the researcher could have chosen to conduct interviews with textile company managers and human resource (HR) staff, in order to understand the organisational effects of the 2008 global financial crisis. The disadvantage of this approach, however, is that it cannot capture the whole picture. The advantages are the dearth of details in what is the lived experienced of affected stakeholders (Newman  Benz, 1998, p.13). On the other hand, the researcher of this dissertation can also conduct a quantitative research, by studying economic indicators. The advantages of this approach are that it illuminates the economic changes before, during, and after the 2008 global financial crisis and it capture statistical trends. The limitations of the quantitative research, nonetheless, are the lack of understanding the deepness and nuances of the impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis, if the study is limited only to interpreting hard facts. Thus, it is more important to combine qualitative and quantitative methods for this research, so that there will be an in-depth look into the experiences of the textile industry during the 2008 global financial crisis.

3.3 Data analysis
For data analysis, findings are categorised according to their connection to the research aims. Furthermore, the data is also analysed using four management models- knowledge management model, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Innovation ecology, and Business responsibility. The analysis is verified through additional multi-rating system from colleagues, which also read the manuscript and provided additional insights.

3.4 Validity and reliability
The concurrent validity of this research is tested and improved through using other researches. All the findings depend on the corroboration of data from different sources. Content validity of this research is improved by using triangulation. This should help enhance the inclusion of all content of the constructs being studied, wherein the constructs are the competitiveness of the national economy and textile industry, as well as the importance of innovation and business responsibility to advancing competitiveness. The constructs have relatively weak predictive validity, because it is possible that other raters would interpret the findings in different ways, especially if they believe that other theoretical frameworks are more suitable for this research. Test-Retest reliability can be improved by providing the criteria of analysis and data collection. Nonetheless, the qualitative aspect of the dissertation can yield diverse interpretations. Parallel forms of reliability are improved through a pre-analysis and post-analysis, wherein post-analysis included feedback from doctorate colleagues. Through this approach, it is also possible to have a good measure of inter-rater reliability.

3.5 Research method limitations
Other articles are rejected because they lack relevance and because of lack of space needed to discuss them more for this paper. This can affect the validity of the study, in terms of representing a wide range of theories in economic and industry development.  This dissertation is also limited by not using statistical analysis that can provide reinforcing or even counter-analysis, when interpreting the data.

3.6 Research ethical issues
Ethical issues consider mores and issues when conducting research. Unethical and ethical behaviour, however, can vary across cultures. For the Turkish government, it is not considered ethical to speak strongly against it, and some of the political analyses of this dissertation can serve as an affront to them. However, it must be highlighted that there is no intention to malign the Turkish government (Lancaster, G 2005, p.33). Instead, this work aims to help the government identify some systemic problems that must also be resolved, in order to advance a sustainable socio-economic development for the country.  The data collected came from public resources, so there should be no access ethical issues in this regard. All possible permissions are also taken, and the writing of the dissertation is carefully done to cite every idea, data, and information that does not come personally from the author of this dissertation.

Chapter Four Results
4.1 Introduction
The 1990s were a poor economic decade for Turkey and government failed to pursue more progressive economic reforms. The 200001 crisis, however, created the motivation to change the governance structures of the economy, through the establishment of the independence of the Central Bank, the modernisation of agricultural support policies, the fortification of banking regulation, the enhancement of powers of regulatory authorities and the creation of new regulatory bodies (Euromoney 2009). In addition, the loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also helped support the economy during the global financial crisis (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.3). This section discusses the impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis on the Turkish economy and the textile industry.

4.2 Turkish economy
The review of literature showed that the 2008 global financial crisis resulted to the contraction of the Turkish economy from 2007 to 2008, which worsened from 2008 to 2009. Low import demand and lower commodity prices lessened the Turkeys current-account deficit from about US42bn, or 5.7 of GDP, in 2008 to about 67 in 2009. The smaller deficit in 2009-10 should help to decrease the  burdens of external financing pressure as the global credit problems made it harder to promote international financing than before the global financial crisis in 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.10). Hence, it can be seen that the economy of Turkey has been affected by the 2008 crisis, through a direct impact on the GDP, lira value, inflation rate, and public and private expenditure.

Hence, the Turkish economy is not completely unscathed. Turkeys economy slowed down since 2006, primarily because of burgeoning deficits, external debt and deflating export demand (Datamonitor 2009, p.16). GDP growth decreased to 4.6 during 2007 and diminished further by 1.1 in 2008 (Datamonitor 2009, p.16).  Weak domestic bank lending, inadequate foreign capital inflows and feeble external demand also took place since the 2008 financial crisis (Datamonitor 2009, p.16).  The Turkish Lira also depreciated further, which resulted to losses in investment and investor confidence (Datamonitor 2009, p.16). Not surprisingly, the unemployment rate increased to 13.6 per cent in January 2009 from 10.3 per cent in September 2008, whereby 811,000 people became unemployed (TSI 2009, cited in Bakir 2009, p.74).

The global financial crisis in 2008 decreased external demand and led to 8.2 contraction in exports of goods and services in the fourth quarter of 2008, the first contraction in almost seven years (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.16). The steep recession in domestic demand pushed imports to plummet by 23 year on year in the final quarter of 2008, after a 2.8 reduction in the third quarter (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.16).  On the supply side, the biggest slowdowns were made by the wholesale and retail sector and the construction and manufacturing industries, where value-added output decreased by 15.4, 13.4 and 10.8, in that order (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.16). High interest rates limited the manufacturers plans to improve production capacity because of the high cost of borrowing, while this also cust domestic demand and international competitiveness by limiting foreign investors and which also drives the value of the lira (Birch 2009, p.165).

Production of capital goods was the most affected, after plummeting to 44.6, which resulted to the stoppage of numerous fixed investments (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Production of intermediate goods decreased by 24, while the production of durable consumer goods lessened by 25.4 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Output of non-durable consumer goods also decreased 10.1, and output of energy fell by 6.4 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Sector-by-sector statistics demonstrated that the mining production plummeted by 3.8, output of electricity, gas and water fell by 6, and the output of manufacturing industry, which makes the majority of the industrial production, decreasing by 24.2 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17).  For the sectors of the manufacturing industry, only food and tobacco products attained a year-on-year increase in output, although the rise is very little, at 1 and 0.7, respectively (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Production of automotives and parts decreased by 60.3, the biggest drop for more than 14 years, and output for radio, television and telecommunications equipment also decelerated by 55.7 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). These figures showed the general decline of the economy, as a result of the 2008 global financial crisis.

Turkeys economy has, nevertheless, weathered the 2008 global financial crisis better than other nations, because it has benefited from prudent fiscal and monetary policies (Datamonitor 2009, p.15).The government wanted to control fiscal policies through the cuts in the expenditure on public infrastructure development (Datamonitor 2009, p.15). In addition, it also increased prime lending rates for commercial banks to remove excess liquidity from the market (Datamonitor 2009, p.15). Inflation in Turkey decreased, as private investments have improved, since 2003 (Datamonitor 2009, p.15). The inflation rate of Turkey lessened from 25.3 in 2003 to 10.9 in 2008, which stayed in single digits in 2006, even as the Turkish lira depreciated (Datamonitor 2009, p.15).

4.3 EU neighbourhood and Turkish textile
One of the affected industrial sectors of Turkey is the Turkish textile sector. Output from textiles, which is a huge export sector, plummeted by 28.3 in 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Some sources say that this can be more attributed to the global competition than the 2008 financial crisis With the opening of both the EU and Turkish markets to Chinese exports, tough price competition from China has had negative effects on Turkeys textile and apparel industries (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.1). The Turkish Statistical Institute reported that Turkey remains a robust net exporter of apparel, with estimated 13.4 billion in exports and 1.3 billion in imports for 2008 (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.1).  One source even reported textile companies that increased revenues, because of their competitiveness in servicing customers and providing high-quality products (Reed  Kara 2009). These textile firms rode the crisis better, because of combination of cutting prices, layoffs, and improving the value of their products (Reed  Kara 2009).

The textile imports are eating up export gains, however. From 2007 to 2008, exports were increased somewhat by 6.1, while imports increased greatly by 53.9 (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.1).  In addition, Turkeys apparel production decreased by 16.9 from 2007 to 2008 (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.1).  The rise in Turkeys imports came from Chinese apparel. From January through September 2007, in comparison to the same duration in 2008, imports from China increased by 60.3 in knit apparel and 48.9 in woven apparel (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.1).  China is the biggest foreign supplier of apparel to Turkey, making up 14.9 of Turkeys overall knit apparel imports and 18.4 of its total woven apparel imports in 2008 (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2).   This can be due to the slump in the economy that can also motivate buyers to buy cheaper apparel from China.

Chinese textile and apparel shipments to Europe also greatly increased (Curran 2009, p.306). For the first ten months of 2008, the EU imported more from China (an increase of 38.54) than any other region of the world (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2).  As the global financial crisis affected other EU textile industries total Chinese textile and apparel exports were up 8.43 for the ten-month period (Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2).    Hence, as other textile industries contracted, Chinese textile increased even more during the 2008 global financial crisis. This shows how low cost strategy worked for the Chinese sector, while the Turkish textile industry suffers from the competition from China in its own country and with dealings with other EU member, as well.

4.3.1 Knowledge management model and the 2008 global financial crisis
How did the knowledge management of the government interplay with the 2008 global financial crisis In terms of the knowledge management of the Turkish government, there are efforts to improve the rate of innovations and inventions, although there is no policy or general framework that promotes knowledge management as a whole and for the textile industry in particular (Datamonitor 2009, p.2). Articles from Reed  Kara (2009) and Pinar and Trapp (2008) suggested that textile firms have not established strong knowledge management models. There is a gap in the literature for this for Turkish textile firms.

The Turkish economy, however, weathered the 2008 global financial crisis because of the resilience of its banking industry. The banking industry used the 2001 crisis lessons to improve its knowledge in managing credit risks. As a result, while other developed economies banks were financially weakened since 2008, the Turkish financial sector remained strong, because Turkish banks holding of securities makes more than 30 of their total assets, which enables them to not suffer from the credit crunch (Biggs 2009 Piggott 2008).

As for the mediating factor of the knowledge management model for the Turkish textile sector, knowledge of demand and supply fluctuations have not fully cushioned the textile industry from contraction. Output from textiles, which is a huge export sector, plummeted by 28.3 in 2008 (Economist Intelligence Unit 2009, p.17). Nevertheless, if textile companies can improve knowledge management in the industry, it can become more robust in competing with other national textile competitors.

4.3.2 Porters diamond of competitive advantage and the 2008 global financial crisis
The competitiveness of Turkish economy greatly improved because of the sound fiscal and monetary policies it pursued after the 2001 financial crisis (Piggott 2008). There is great competitive advantage obtained from the welfare governance of Turkey. Sources, on the other hand, showed that the Turkish textile industry cannot compete through cost leadership, because this is already the advantage of the Chinese textile sector (Curran 2009, p.306 Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2). In order to be competitive, the Turkish textile industry must pursue differentiation strategies that can improve perceptions of quality and difference for the Turkish textile.

4.3.3 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the 2008 global financial crisis
Using the AHP, the determined weaknesses of the economy during the 2008 global financial crisis hail from these factors liquidity issues, political issues, governance concerns, and lack of innovation and knowledge management (Curran 2009, p.306 Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2 Economist Intelligence Unit 2009). Among these factors, the most imminent are the political issues, because they can arise anytime and can directly affect the economy, followed by governance issues and lack of innovation and knowledge management. Benzing et al. (2009) studied entrepreneurship in Turkey and findings showed that the tax structure provided difficulties for entrepreneurs. There are also poor government financial support for small and medium enterprises and government programs for entrepreneurship (Benzing et al. 2009). Sources also pointed out the lack of innovation and knowledge management that can further weaken the competitiveness of the Turkish textile industry, as the onslaught of cheaper textile from China continues (Curran 2009, p.306 Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2).

4.3.4 Innovation ecology and the 2008 global financial crisis
Studies showed the importance of national context in shaping the innovative behavior of firms (Krugman, 1994, cited in Griffiths et al. 2009, p.377). Woolley and Rottner (2008) state that the first-mover advantage that takes place can come from the earliest innovation policies dealing with science and technology, and economic initiatives reported higher rates of firm foundings  (cited in Griffiths et al. 2009, p.377). Turkish national institutions (the education system, patent law, government policies, and RD), however, is analysed as not being able to spur innovation, because of lack of policies and funding for greater innovations in the textile industry (van Rooij et al., 2008, cited in Griffiths et al. 2009, p.377).

4.3.5 Business responsibility at macro and micro levels and the 2008 global financial crisis
Social Responsibility Journal (2008) analysed and compared CSR between Turkey and the UK. Findings showed that their laws do not differ, but compliance is weaker in Turkey than in the UK. Ararat (2008) analysed CSR practices in Turkey, and noted that the culture does not espouse CSR to a higher level compared to other developed countries. She concluded that CSR has to be an exogenous and institutional process, in order to promote it across industries. Another study highlighted that when the economy contracted, female workers are not discriminated, although they received lower pay (Limoncuolu  i_li 2009). These gender inequitable practices undermine CSR in corporate levels.

Chapter Five Discussion
5.1 Introduction
The results indicate that the Turkish economy weathered the 2008 global financial crisis better than other countries, because of its sound fiscal and monetary policies. However, using the theoretical frameworks of innovation, business responsibility, and knowledge management, findings showed that the Turkish government lacks more solid and clearer policies on these business management concerns, which could have also contributed to the economic contraction of Turkey from 2008 to 2010. This chapter discusses the findings in relation to the theories described in the review of literature.

5.2 Summary of research findings
Based on the research findings, the Turkish economy is also affected by the 2008 global financial crisis, as evident in its contractions in the GDP growth rate and sectoral growth rates, from 2007 to 2008, and even until 2009. It can be argued that the effects of the financial crisis became more pronounced during 2009, as the effects of the recession showed up in the economic index a year after it arrived in Turkey. Findings also showed that while the Turkish textile industry suffered, it did not become widely hurt, because of the inherent competitiveness of the industry. Nonetheless, global and domestic textile competition continues to be more intense, especially coming from the competitor from Asia- namely China. Findings also showed that there are weak or unconsolidated practices of knowledge management, innovation, and business responsibility, because of lack of compliance and regulation.

5.3 Knowledge management model
Danskin et al. (2005) propose proactive knowledge management model that do not only cut costs and cycle time, but also develops knowledge for predictive management purposes (p.96). The proactive dimension of knowledge management in Turkey is not readily apparent, unless to cut costs. There is a need to further study how knowledge management is applied and promoted on the national and local firm levels, especially during the 2008 global financial crisis, so that it can be determined exactly how the lack of more concrete knowledge management policies and practices contributed to the economic contraction from 2008 onwards.

5.4 Porters diamond of competitive advantage
Based on the competitive advantage theory, Turkey cannot compete with contender China as a low-cost textile industry, which is one of the reasons that the textile industry contracted during the 2008 global financial crisis. It can only compete through product differentiation. Pinar andTrapp (2008) highlight the need for differentiation, because textile is something that can also be sold for differences in perceived values. This will be explored further in the recommendations chapter of this paper.

5.5 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
AHP already designates the following priorities, from top to lowest priority political issues, lack of innovation and knowledge management, governance concerns, and liquidity issues (Curran 2009, p.306 Cotton Incorporated Supply Chain 2008, p.2 Economist Intelligence Unit 2009). These priorities are seen from the impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis on GDP, inflation rate, and exchange rate, which can be lessened if the government paid attention more to political issues, lack of innovation and knowledge management, governance concerns, and liquidity issues.

5.6 Innovation ecology
There is a need for national innovation trajectories that can mould the innovative outcomes of the country, which is one of the reasons that the Turkish economy also slowed down in 2008 (Griffiths et al. 2009, p.377).   This can be done through connecting public and private agencies that promote and develop innovation ecology (Griffiths et al. 2009, p.377).  Such ecology is not yet evident in the Turkish textile industry, which can also help explain its lower performance from 2008 to 2009.

5.7 Business responsibility at macro and micro levels
Business responsibility requires further enhancement for macro and micro levels. Since it is not embedded in the organisational and national cultures, there is a necessity to make business responsibility an exogenous variable (Ararat 2008). Government intervention will be perennial in promoting widespread CSR in the textile industry, which can lead to more equitable business practices, and these actions can decrease the direct impact of the 2008 global financial crisis on the economy, as already seen in the business responsibility in the banking sector which also made it stronger during the 2008 financial crisis.

Chapter Six Conclusions and recommendations
6.1 Conclusions
Findings of this dissertation showed that the Turkish economy is also affected by the 2008 global financial crisis, but its monetary and fiscal policies prevented it from being greatly contracted. On the other hand, the Turkish textile industry remains regionally competitive, because of perceptions of value for its products. As a result, it is not greatly affected by the 2008 global financial crisis, although its revenues dipped. However, these quality perceptions are being not enough, because of the cost leadership of other global and EU textile competitors, primarily China. It is decisive for the Turkish government to intervene and ensure that it can prepare the textile industry, so that it can establish a stronger positioning in the market. It is important to ascertain competitiveness through policies that promote and reward organisational practices of knowledge management, innovation, and CSR. Knowledge management strengthened the banking sector for the 2008 global financial crisis and the same can be done for the textile industry and the whole economy. The government should take the lead in promoting these factors, through policymaking and providing economic incentives for responsive companies.

6.2 Recommendations
The primary recommendations will involve three factors- knowledge management, innovation, and business responsibility. According to the review of literature, when properly managed and integrated into the strategic management framework of textile firms, knowledge management, innovation, and business responsibility can be linked to corporate performance, and consequently, to national economic performance. In addition, these factors will be merged to form a distinctive competitive strategy that will reverberate to the textile industry.

6.2.1 Knowledge management
The government needs to pursue a more active policy that can promote knowledge management. This should be supported by IT and IS policies, which will collaborate to help provide relevant and customised knowledge management technology platforms (Danskin et al. 2005). The government should provide an information campaign and projects that support knowledge management through economic incentives, such as tax cuts for companies that can provide and develop knowledge management systems and practices.

6.2.2 Innovation
The government must also reward innovation among industries, through providing RD grants for promising innovative projects. It must be more adamant in forming an innovation technology through linking agencies, resources, and companies. This innovation ecology should also improve entrepreneurship that can also enhance national performance and competitiveness. For the textile industry, ingredient branding can be an effective differentiator. Ingredient branding is the practice of promoting product recognition through the use of one brands key attributes (ingredients) in another brand (Keller 2003 McCarthy  Norris 1999 Vaidyanathan  Aggarwal 2000, cited in Pinar  Trapp 2008, p.32). The primary impetus for using ingredient branding is that it improves differentiating the sector through highlighting different raw materials (Pinar  Trapp 2008, p.32). An article argued In this case, an ingredient of the brand could serve as a differentiator for the brand, even if customers do not understand how the ingredient works, and thus improve the competitiveness of the host brand Pinar  Trapp 2008, p.32). The government can host competitions that can reward ingredient branding efforts, which can stimulate innovation in the textile industry.

6.2.3 Business responsibility
Business responsibility must also be enhanced in the macro and micro level. For the macro level, the government should study firm compliance through third-party surveys and provide responses through more stringent monitoring practices. For the micro level, the government response can be a strong exogenous variable that can spur CSR at firm levels. The textile industry can take advantage of CSR by promoting diversity management policies that can maximise knowledge management from a pluralistic workforce.
1.
a)  Oligopoly is a market structure that is characterized by a small number of firms. In this case, interdependence in regard to market policies is highly emphasized.

b) The reasons for existence of oligopolies include existence of economies of scale due to the fact that large firms are able to operate at minimum average cost, the urge to create mergers and acquisitions and the third reason being ownership of patents by these oligopolistic firms.

2.
a) The four firm concentration ratio can be defined as a traditional measure of the market          concentration of the four biggest firms in a particular given industry. This kind of ratio is very important especially for the purposes of measuring the extent of market control by these four biggest industries.

b) The four firm concentration ratio is 251510858

c) i) the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index  is also a traditional measure but is concerned with the size of a firm in a certain industry and is an index that is also concerned with the competition of big firms in that industry.

ii) The larger the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index the greater the market power and the lower the market competition.

4)
a) The three different types of barriers to entry in a monopoly include
Advertising - this arises whereby a firm is able to create a very strong advertising campaign which cannot match the advertising campaigns which are administered by other firms thereby creating a very strong brand loyalty hence inhibiting entry of other firms.

Control of an important input of production - this is when the firm is only the one that has the capability to produce a particular input and hence other firms cannot produce the same.

Government regulation - the government may render competition to a particular firm through means such as granting of patents illegal and thus end up creating a statutory monopoly.

b) The benefits of patents in an economic point of view include
Recovery of research and development cost that was used during the innovation of the product. This means that the firm is able to gain full income by pricing the innovation at its desired price as there is no competition.

Another advantage is the acquisition of legal exclusionary rights which exclude other firms from entering the market. In this regard a barrier to entry is created which completely eliminates market competition.

Income improvement is also another advantage and is as a result of other firms not having the capability to access the market. In this regard the firm will be able to generate more income due to lack of competition from other firms.

4
a) Price discrimination is said to exist when the same product is sold at different prices to different buyers.

b) The conditions which are necessary for price discrimination are
market must be divided into sub markets
different submarkets must have different price elasticitys
there must be effective separation of the different sub markets

c) Not every monopoly can price discriminate because price discrimination in a monopoly is determined by several factors such as the classes of buyers (rich or poor) so as to determine what elasticitys to give between various markets and the cost differences associated with price discrimination.

5)
a) The features of a monopolistic competition that differentiate it from a monopoly include
The existence of many substitutes in the monopolistic competition is not there in the monopoly market and instead in the monopoly market there are large numbers of buyers but very few sellers
Monopolistic competition is characterized by extensive advertising which is not exactly the case with a monopoly. A monopoly has its market share by default as there are no competitors.
In the monopolistic competition the demand curve and cost curves are the same for the firms whereas in a monopoly only one demand function for the firm exists. This is because a monopoly is a price giver whereas a monopolistic competition is a price taker.
5)
b)
the diagram that shows a monopolistic competition making profit in  the short run is figure A
the diagram that shows a monopolistic competition making profit in  the long run is figure C
the diagram that shows a monopolistic competition making loss in  the long run is figure B
5)
c) The fact that economic profits arise when revenues exceed the opportunity cost of inputs is very important in this analysis. Economic profit in the monopolistic set up will be eliminated in the long run due to the fact that both demand and average cost will increase in the long run unlike in perfect competition whereby costs remain stable even in the long run.

6) In the short run the monopolist will choose output level A. this is because this is the level of output at which the short run marginal cost curve cuts the short run marginal revenue curve. At this point the slope of both the marginal cost and marginal revenue cost curves are equal.

7)
a) Nash equilibrium is a game theory concept that is widely used in decision making. Nash equilibrium is used to give a solution in a game of two players where each of the players knows about the equilibrium strategies of other players in the game. In this kind of solution no player stands a chance to benefit unilaterally. For example the prisoners dilemma

Dominant strategy equilibrium is a concept that is used to solve many simple games. It occurs when one strategy used by a player is better than another strategy that is applied by another player in the same game.

b) The dominant strategy by Bob is cheat on agreement. This is because regardless of the action taken by Dona he will make a profit

The dominant strategy by Dona is cheat on agreement. This is because regardless of the action taken by Bob he will make a profit

To maximize potential gain both players should stand by the agreement. This is because if they do so they will gain a profit of 10000 as compared to both of the cheating which would result to a profit of only 4000. The outcome of the game will be the uncooperative solution that both Dona and Bob will cheat. This is because none of them will want to make a loss if the other does not stand by the agreement while the other does stand by the agreement.

c) The dominant strategy equilibrium for firm A is to charge a low price. This is because this will yield the highest profit regardless of the action taken by B.

How can tax cuts help revive the economy

There are various parameters which are applied by the government to revive the economy. The economy of a nation depends on consumer spending which depends on income generation. Cutting taxes is one of the mechanisms applied by a government in reviving the economy. This is provided in the physical policy. Tax cuts can be implemented in order to increase the amount of money in consumers pockets. Tax cuts reduce the cost of production of products by firms. This as result reduces the prices of commodities produced in those firms. This influences consumer to purchase more products hence increasing consumer spending.

Tax cuts can help revive when applied in some sectors such as National Insurance. Cutting taxes towards jobs will create employment. Employment is one of the parameters of determining the economy. When most people are employed, there is equal income generation. This improves the purchasing power thus improving economy. Income tax is taxes charged on employed people. Increasing income tax and most for those earning more, affects the economy. This is because entrepreneurs are discouraged by the move of increasing income tax. Entrepreneurs are very vital in an economy. In order to encourage entrepreneurs income tax should be reduced.

Tax cuts ensure more money circulation. This means that people have more money in their pockets which increases the aggregate demand of goods. The demand of goods is determined by the amount of money one has. Tax cuts increases the amount of tax collected through taxation. This is because all people would be willing to pay tax. It has the trend of rich people to dodge from taxation. This would not happen since when taxes are reduced no one will feel the weight.

Tax cuts may either be good or bad based on what is perceived to be achieved. Tax cuts will also be determined by the economy status. Tax cuts can be introduced selectively to both the lower and middle classes. Government expenditure can be increased by participation in public issues such as education and health care. Reducing taxes for both the middle and lower classes implies more money within their vicinity. Consumption depends on income generation. Having more money means getting more goods which were not affordable. Buying more goods means increase in Gross Domestic Product which is a parameter of good economy.

Tax cuts favor small businesses which are the strongholds in an economy. Reducing taxes means reduced inputs in small business. This raises the number of small businesses thus stimulating the economy. Tax cuts increases job creation by ensuring favorable working environment. Economic growth depends on adequate flow of goods and services. It does not depend on existing goods and services. The production depends on the support provided towards final goods and services. This defines the funding done towards production. Most firms depend on savings to purchase consumer goods. Money in the real essence controls the flow of goods. This is ensured by implementing tax cuts.

Taxation is major source of revenues to the government. The government uses the money collected from tax to pay its workers. The government affects wealth generation by taxing employed people. Economic revival is normally affected since people do not have money to purchase what they do not have. Loose fiscal policy leads to economic revival as everybody can purchase what heshe wants. In conclusion, tax cuts ensure continuous flow of final goods.

The Automotive Crisis

The automotive industry crisis that transpired between 2008 and 2010 was basically the consequence of the global financial recession that affected many countries around the world. Aside from financial downturn, the automotive crisis was also partially the result of the significant increase in the automotive fuel prices as well as the consumers shift to more environment-friendly automobiles. Alarmingly, the crisis became even more critical by the last part of 2008 as it depressingly affected the prices of automobile raw materials. Consequently, the popularity of cars like pickup trucks and sports utility vehicles (SUV) immediately declined. Automakers like Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, and Opel, which primarily focus on manufacturing the aforesaid types of vehicles were the ones significantly affected due to their high profit margins. Although the automotive industry crisis was experienced by some Asian and Canadian automobile manufacturers, the American and European American automobile manufacturing industries were the ones greatly damaged seeing that many of their automobile companies were driven to the threshold of bankruptcy.

Overview of the Financial Crisis
Between 2008 and 2010, the global economy has experienced one of the most extreme depressions in the modern history. The badly affected United States, through its Federal Reserve and government, attempted to stabilize the economy by lowering the interest rates as well as issuing tax rebates. However, despite these brave efforts, the economic crisis in the country expanded considerably throughout the rest of the world. Distressingly, the continued existence of numerous manufacturers, especially the automobile manufactures, was even more endangered not only because of the faltering American economy, but also of the soaring fuel prices that occurred during the period. Expectedly, the European automotive sector became equally powerless to break out the ongoing recession. Because of the global financial crisis, the worldwide automobile sales in 2008 dropped by three percent while the sales in early 2009 even more decreased to almost 35 percent when compared to the preceding year (Roland Berger, 2009). During this period, the overall profitability of the automotive manufacturers was undoubtedly in a low point.

The Automobile Crisis in the United States and Europe
Unlike the United States and Europe, automobile manufacturers in Asia were not significantly affected by the problems brought by the economic crisis, oil price increases, and the publics new expectations on automobiles. Statistics reveal that the market shares of automakers from the United States and Europe in the past several years have been noticeably eroding, while Asian carmakers, particularly the Japanese, are strongly gaining a toehold with the American and European markets. According to consumer reports, for the first time in the history of its inventory of most recommended automobiles, the Top 10 picks of car buyers were all automobiles manufactured by Asian carmakers. In view of this, many experts believe that the crisis in automobile industry in the United States and Europe was not mainly the consequence of the economic crisis, but also the result of poor business practices. In fact, many of the American-based manufacturers were filing for bankruptcy as a consequence of the admitted fact that they have not properly managed their capital, time, and products.

Unlike in the United States, however, where automobile manufacturers are somewhat persuaded to file for bankruptcy protection from creditors as part of an agreement with the government under which they can receive billions in loans from the treasury, restructure their debt, clear themselves of liabilities, and sell their assets, the scenario in Europe is generally very different given that closing plants is not an absolute option considering the role of the Union and the governments. Automobile manufacturers in Europe would more likely reduce their output by minimizing production line in any of its department or converting facilities to serve other functions like component plants. All the same, the restructuring would likely result in wage reductions for the workforce as well as streamlining throughout the company consistent with the goal of meeting lower operating cost-targets.

United States
Records show that from the time Chrysler, General Motors, and Ford (otherwise known as the Big Three) started their operations in the United States, they had been consistently and outstandingly profitable. However, at the onset of 2008, the car sales in the United States significantly declined, thus affecting these U.S. based automobile manufacturers. As a result, Chrysler, General Motors, and Ford started to experience diminished market shares, financial losses, and severe reduction of their respective employment levels. The most disappointing part for these American automobile companies, however, is the sharp plunge in their truck sales, particularly for Chrysler and Ford. These companies throughout the years had maintained a stable selling with their Sports Utility Vehicle lines, but following the financial crisis, oil price increases, and consumers preference towards smaller, foreign-made SUVs, their sales dropped sharply.

Alarmingly, due to the quick drop of Chrysler, General Motors, and Fords sales last year the operations of some of their factories were voluntarily discontinued. General Motors as well disseminated several of its workers in certain divisions into self-regulating companies in order for them to survive. Their ensuing application of enormous loans caused greater public assessment of Americas automotive industry apart from the usual criticism of the industrys high labor wages, product quality, and product range. Unfortunately, in early 2009, the prospect of Chrysler and General Motors to keep away from bankruptcy ultimately disappeared. The governments assistance to Chrysler and General Motors triggered the start of the most distressing automobile crisis in history. In order to assist the American automobile industry invest in modern production technology, the United States Congress endorsed an aid package amounting to 25 billion or as much as 19.7 billion euros. The companies poor business practices and management were viewed by many experts to have played significant roles in their eventual bankruptcy.

Europe
In Europe, the automotive industry had been considered as the most vital mechanism that moves the economy. Approximately 10 percent of jobs in Europe relied directly or indirectly on the automotive sector, benefiting about 12 million families. Throughout the years, the industry had been the leading promoter in innovation, had had a pool of high-skilled workforce that reinforced Europes international competitiveness, and had been an extraordinary factor in the export sector. European manufacturers have been able to easily address any problems concerning excess production numbers because of the industrys aforesaid superiority. The automotive industry in Europe had indeed been an essential industry and was expected to have a sound future due to its strong commitment to manufacturing high-tech, world-leading automobiles worldwide.

However, like in the United States, the European commercial vehicle and passenger car manufacturers were critically affected by the financial crisis and ensuing economic downturn that commenced more than two years ago. Automobile sales went down sharply that resulted in the trimming down of production of all automotive suppliers and manufacturers in Europe. Unfortunately, the credit crunch made the problem of financing daily operations of the European automotive sector as well as the diminishing consumer demand for new trucks and cars even more intense, which all the more resulted in a drop in demand for both commercial vehicles and passenger cars. In 2008, several European automakers were forced to cut back workforce, and even close their factories. Sadly, during the second half of 2009, additional insolvencies followed due to significant decrease in the production of some automobile facilities.

Aside from the trend towards smaller cars and global recession, experts believe that the current crisis in the automotive industry in Europe is basically the result of financial, structural, and economic failure. Because of an ever more diverse competition on product assortment, and the unexpected serious demand of vehicles that meet the environmental requirements, the automobile manufacturers in Europe were left with low profit margins. Alas, the manufacturers have significantly inadequate access to credit and, when available, it generally provides higher interest rates for suppliers and for prospective buyers of trucks and cars.

In view of the aforesaid difficulties, the affected European automakers cast an envious eye at the Americas approach to saving its automobile industry and, for that reason, sought a comparable action. Seeing the government of the United States provided billions of dollars to save Chrysler, General Motors, and Ford before they failed, European manufacturers called on European Union institutions and governments to help them achieve a strong and healthy automotive industry. Accordingly, last November 2008, the head of the Eurogroup of single currency nations, Steinmeier, and Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, ordered the members of European Union states to formulate a general rescue package that would assist European automobile manufacturers suffering from the existing economic crisis.

The General Motors Company
General Motors Company is a United States-based automobile manufacturer with a head office in Detroit, Michigan. It was founded by William Crapo on September 16, 1908, initially as a holding company for Buick (The New York Times, 2010). From 1923 to 1946, and under the guidance of its chief executive, Alfred P. Sloan, Jr., General Motors almost single-handedly carried the automobile sector in the United States through its effort on meeting the amazing demands of the consumers, particularly by offering several diverse ranges of automobiles like Buick, Cadillac, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Chevrolet. These new product offerings gave General Motors a 46 percent share of the American auto market during the 1950s, while Chrysler and Ford combined for only 44 percent, and everyone else shared just 10 percent. The peak of General Motors success continued in the next decades when the company owned 50 percent share of the truck and car market in the United States.

General Motors was considered as the leading company in the most significant industry in the world for the most part of the 20th century (The New York Times, 2010). Throughout the years of its operation, General Motors had not only piloted automotive modernizations, but also helped register the new breed of immense, domineering international corporations that formed the post-war economy. The company revolutionized Detroit into the Silicon Valley of its day, which eventually symbolized the countrys competence for modernization. The companys unprecedented growth was noticed in its hundreds of thousands of workers and numerous assembly plants that operated all over the United States. General Motors holds the record as the major car manufacturer in the world since 1931, which was only broken in 2009 when Toyota surpassed General Motors worldwide sales.

General Motors - Crisis in USA
By the fall of 2008, General Motors lost its distinction as the worlds leading car manufacturer. Despite General Motors two-year steep financial controls, the company all the same found itself on the boundary, thus forcing them to petition the federal government for the funding it needed to continue the companys operation. Through the order of former President George W. Bush in December 2008, General Motors received 9 billion in federal aid (The New York Times, 2010). In the following year, a restructuring plan was proposed by the companys chief executive, Rick Wagoner, which was eventually rejected by President Obama. President Obama instead ordered General Motors to adjust itself within 90 days into a smaller, leaner company and to win profound compromises from its bond-holders, suppliers, and unions. Nonetheless, after some time, the creditors of the company resisted and the auto task force of President Obama only became persuaded that the safeguard of bankruptcy court would be the most excellent move to save General Motors.  

Accordingly, in June of last year, the bankruptcy documents were filed by General Motors and the process was concluded a month later when the company sold its viable assets to a new, government-owned corporation. The federal government holds almost 61 percent of the new company, with the bondholders, healthcare trust for the United Auto Workers union, and Canadian government owning the balance. As a result of this development, the company becomes much smaller, with brands like Pontiac, Hummer and Saturn were either closed or sold. Moreover, brands like GMC, Cadillac, and Chevrolet were folded into the new company known as Vehicle Acquisition Company, but this company was all the same renamed eventually again to General Motors Company. With thousands of dealers having been severed throughout the reorganization, the new company is left with a smaller sales network. Likewise, as competitors profited from General Motors troubles, the new companys market share has also dropped to 20 percent, or down from more than 50 percent from its glory days, while the current international sales reveal somewhat comparable to its domestic sales.

General Motors - Crisis in Europe
Starting 2008, General Motors already declared an accumulated operating loss of about 30.9 billion. Following this announcement, experts believe that the gleaming future of General Motors in Europe likewise became uncertain. Struggling to stay afloat, General Motors appealed for AUS 6.6 billion assistance from individual European governments. Thus, in the following year, the head of the European Union arranged for a crisis conference of all the member states that have General Motors plants operating within their jurisdiction. European Union claims that as of the moment, General Motors has not demonstrated that it can be gainful in the future if bailout would in fact happen.

Last January of this year, General Motors finally announced the shutting down of its Opel plant in Antwerp, Belgium, which is the German unit of the faltering company. This particular facility was the first plant closed by General Motors in Europe from the time the company initiated a restructuring plan following the global economic crisis. The Antwerp plant had more than 2,600 workers, comprising about five percent of the Opel workforce in Europe. According to the company, the workers of this plant built almost 89,000 Astra compacts model last year, but in view of the existing economic environment that resulted in the enormous disparity between its production and sales, the company believes that the only reasonable approach left is to shut down the Antwerp plant .

Accordingly, the European Union demands that General Motors should reveal to the Union everything  from the companys plans with its European facilities, the companys preparedness to sustain accountability for its European companies, to the things that the company is undertaking with its property rights. The European Union demanded that General Motors must incorporate an outline of its future business strategy and must likewise demonstrate that the company is capable of remaining viable. As of the moment, no date has been set for further crisis conference, but the head of the Union believes that the participants would similarly include Britain, Germany and other countries with General Motors plants.

The Opel Company
Adam Opel GmbH is an automobile company established by Adam Opel on 1853 in Rsselsheim, Germany. At the beginning, Opels business was mainly focused on manufacturing sewing machines in Germany. It was only four years after Adam Opels death in 1895 when the company, which by that time managed by Adam Opels children, became a full-fledged automobile industry. During its existence, Opel made significant investments in the expansion of its European operations and plants along with new facilities all over the world. In 1929, Opel eventually became a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Motors.

Throughout the years, General Motors made the Opel headquarters in Germany as its lead source for technology and design as well as its source of international product development plans (Opel Motorsport Club, 2008). During the 1990s, the company made noteworthy development in the internationalization of the Opel brand, in innovative product technology, and in expanding its model series. In early 2009, however, Opels future likewise became uncertain as global financial crisis constrained its parent company the General Motors towards bankruptcy. During this wearisome period, the company was subjected to a bidding process under the administration of a trustee, with controlling board composed of German government employees, and representative of General Motors.

Because of the global crisis, Opel decided to sell its majority stake last September 2009 to Russias Sberbank, and the latters partner Magna International, a Canadian-Australian auto parts company. A month later, however, General Motors pulled out from the aforesaid agreement to sell. General Motors believes that it would be best for the company to restructure itself for European business, which it had identified as a favored global approach for the companys small cars. Accordingly, General Motors restructured its European operations within the same year by combining Opel, based in Rsselsheim, Germany, with Vauxhall, based in Britain. Moreover, in an attempt to win the support of Chancellor Angela Merkels government, from which General Motors appealed for reorganizing assistance, the company promised not to shut down the operations of any of its four Opel facilities in Germany.

Opel - Crisis in USA
In the wake of economic crisis in the United States automobile sector and the global market turmoil, General Motors announced that it is seeking assistance in countries where it has major manufacturing plants (Agence France-Presse AFP, 2008). In particular, General Motors claimed that the impact of the economic slowdown and international financial crisis led to the production trouble of two of its European plants that employed almost 6,000 worker. The assessment reveals that Opel needs at least two billion euros in possible public loan securities, which the General Motors obviously cannot afford. The objective of the request is to make sure that additional loans are availed of because the global financial condition made the parent company, General Motors, even more deteriorated. The said loans are planned to cover investment in assembly plants and product development. For that reason, the finance minister, the economy minister, as well as the federal government are taking control of the wavering company. The federal government consequently guaranteed one billion euros, while Thuringia, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Rhine-Westphalia, where Opel has plants assured the second billion (AFP, 2008)

Opel - Crisis in Europe
This year, General Motors forecasts that the West European car market will sharply decrease by 1.5 million vehicles from the previous years market, or a drop of almost four million from the peak in 2007. Unfortunately for Opel, its cars are distributed in countries where many experts believe there is going to be no market increase. In view of this, the streamlining analysis of General Motors calls for the shutting down of European operation by approximately 20 percent in order for the company to be profitable by 2012. Last January 2010, General Motors indeed closed its Opel plant in Antwerp, Belgium, which was the initial concrete action that the company had engaged toward overhauling its Opel division. According to General Motors, closing the Antwerp plant will facilitate the company in attaining its reformation target as it cuts roughly nine percent of its operation. The entire restructuring plan, however, involves cutting 1,300 administration and sales jobs, in addition to 7,000 in manufacturing, which would result to the biggest revamp in the history of the Opel car company.

Nevertheless, Opel likewise does not discard the possibilities of partially selling 25 to 50 percent of its share, which will transform the company into a joint-stock company. This option is also what General Motors has been planning since the start of 2009 when it was confronted with the reality that Opel is operating under billions in emergency federal loans. Although General Motors will have the ultimate decision on who acquires Opel, European governments are still playing a decisive role in the sale process given that they are being requested to dispense billions of euros worth of loan securities. The sale would eventually commence the detachment of Opel from the domain of General Motors.

Effects of the Crisis to Other Car Companies
From the inception of the global financial crisis, many experts have already suggested that the crisis would set off the constriction of the market, downsize investment, and eventually result in worker lay-offs. During the past months, the problem has indeed consistently led to retrenchment of numerous workers and, in a number of cases, even to the shutting down of various manufacturing plants. In the automotive sector, the crisis has likewise caused the reduction of the working hours in direct and indirect jobs as well as in job losses. Aside from General Motors and Opel that have been greatly affected by the financial crisis, other automobile manufacturing companies like Chrysler, Ford, Porsche and the Mercedes were also significantly affected by the phenomenon that took place during the past months.

Chrysler
Since 1925, the Chrysler Corporation had been a giant in the automotive industry (Ramsey  Kary, 2009).  The company was one of the biggest manufacturers in North America, and they became very popular due to its creation of the model vehicles like the minivan, K-car, Barracuda, and Jeep. Like any other automobile companies, Chrysler received its share of good and bad times during its existence. However, Chryslers most difficult problem to date took place during the onset of the global financial crisis when the credit markets in the United States were frozen. In view of that, Chrysler dealers were prevented from placing wholesale orders for new vehicles because of lack of access to market competitiveness funding, and its customers as well prevented from purchasing vehicles because of lack of access to competitive financing. This resulted in the constriction of Chrysler cash inflows thereby making the company incapable to pay its billions of dollars in cash payment obligations, particularly payment for raw materials and wages for the workers. In the end, Chryslers liquidity slowly fell below the level needed to maintain its everyday operations.

The bad times of Chrysler went to its pinnacle when the company filed for bankruptcy protection on May 2009 along with its proposal for partnership with Fiat, an Italian automaker. At this time, the company has roughly 54,000 workers, listed assets of over 39.3 billion, and a debt amounting to over 55.2 billion. Upon reaching the agreement, Chrysler sold most of its assets to Fiat, while the remaining holdings were sold to a recently formed company identified as Chrysler Group LLC. The payment for the remaining holdings amounting to 6.6 billion to the insolvent Chrysler was financed by the federal government. Some of the biggest creditors of the company, particularly the parts suppliers, were likewise paid off during bankruptcy as part of the government supported streamlining.

The government asserted that the bailout was produced and approved to prevent the number three automaker in the United States from sliding into a bankruptcy. The government believes that if the bailout was not provided to Chrysler, it would have resulted in the retrenchments of hundreds of thousands of direct and indirect jobs as well as sent tremor through the countrys financial markets. Like General Motors, the assistance from the government and bankruptcy process allowed Chrysler to get rid of much of their debt far more reasonably, thus leaving both companies with healthier financial statements .

Ford
Unlike Chrysler and General Motors, Ford has carefully secured a line of credit lest the company needs a bridging loan in the near future. The company mortgaged much of its operations to amass money to disburse for its downsizing and reorganization of its operations in North America. However, Ford is unquestionably not out of the woods yet as many are still in doubt concerning how much higher the market shares of the company could go. Although Ford posted sturdy gains in its United States market share throughout most of the months in 2009 against its long time competitors, this accomplishment would not be enjoyed by Ford anytime soon seeing that Chrysler and General Motors are no longer in bankruptcy.

Aside from the problem of market share, there are likewise uncertainties on the massive pool of borrowed funds on which the company draws given that these will eventually become a heavy weight for the company to carry while moving forward. Ford has approximately no less than 26 billion in debt that is burdening on its financial statements. To stay vigorous, the company perhaps needs to shell out at least 5 billion for its debt, an amount which cannot be easily generated out of the market sales. In view of this, many investors believe that Ford will sooner or later sell additional shares in order to cut back on its debts, thus diluting the holdings of current shareholders. Therefore, one of the crucial questions now developing to Ford Company is whether its move to avoid bankruptcy is essentially good or bad for the company in the long-run.

Porsche
Porsche Automobil Holdings SE is a German automotive manufacturer of luxury vehicles. The first Porsche automobile was built on June 8, 1948 by Ferdinand Porsche. The initial batch of Porsche automobiles was hand-built in GmndKrnten. However, it was only in 1959 when Porsche started its extensive operations by introducing a new generation of Porsche design to the market, including the 911 model, which eventually became one of the leading sports cars in the world during the 1960s. In modern years, Porsche have produced a number of other popular high performance vehicles, including Cayenne SUVs, and Cayman and Boxster sports cars. In 2009, Porsche entered to a merger agreement with Volkswagen, the leading automaker in Europe, which will take effect in 2011.

Unfortunately, some time during the global financial crisis, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Porsche Automobil Holdings SE, Dr. Wendelin Wiedeking, announced that just like any other automotive companies, Porsche was likewise not able to break out from the general downward movement in the global automotive industry during the first half of 2008. As a result, last January 2009, Porsche declared a sales plunge of approximately 14.3 percent or about Euro three billion. Expectedly, the global financial crisis has turned over several previously secured dealings of Porsche, particularly the companys objective to get the better of Volkswagen.

Mercedes-Benz
Mercedes-Benz is a Germany-based manufacturer of trucks, coaches, buses, and luxury automobiles. The first Mercedes-Benz vehicles were manufactured in 1926, which integrated several safety and technological innovations now common in many automobiles. Throughout the years, the company has created a full range of passenger, heavy commercial and light commercial equipment, as well as maintained a reputation for its durability and quality. Because of Mercedes-Benzs success and popularity, its vehicles are now greatly patronized by up-and-coming economies, like India, Russia and China. In China, Mercedes-Benz became the fastest-growing automobile brand with 65 percent market share. Nonetheless, because of the global recessions impact on the luxury car sector, the worldwide sales of its compact urban Smart cars and luxury Mercedes-Benz cars plunged by more than 10 percent. Last year, the sales of Smart cars dropped by about 13 percent, while Mercedes-Benz luxury cars dropped by 9.7 percent. In view of this, Mercedes COO Rainer Schmueckle announced in 2008 that the company is likewise experiencing a full blown sales crisis and is already cutting the number of its temporary workers.

However, fortunately for the company, during the last quarter of 2009, Mercedes was able to post a 13 percent increase in sales, basically due to the companys efforts to penetrate in the aforesaid key emerging markets. Overall, as compared to other giant car manufacturers in the United States and Europe, Mercedes-Benz has somewhat escaped from the impacts of global financial crisis. In 2009, the companys monthly sales on mainland China increased by 21 percent. During the same period, the company sold around 1,600 units of its SUVs, which became the foremost contributor to the companys overall growth in China. Moreover, the S-Class model of Mercedes-Benz was able to hold the top position in the high-end division in Chinas luxury car market. This year, the company is expected to introduce its latest luxury grand tourer automobile to the market, the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG, which the company expects to generate high sales.

Steps to Accomplish
The wellbeing of automobile industry is of enormous importance to the condition of economy of any country. It is important for the governments to safeguard their respective automobile industry from impacts of the global financial crisis by maintaining their industry strong and fresh. It is therefore without doubt that the automobile crisis that has taken place during the past months can only be blamed to the governments failure to establish a sound policy that protects the industry, particularly on the wariness of banks to take risks on providing loans to automakers.

Year 2009 was certainly a challenging time for the automotive industry. After the enormous restrains during the said year, the key players in the global automotive market are now planning to invest intensely again in future vehicle programs. Thus, it is very crucial that the United States and European institutions and governments continually guarantee automobile companies access to liquidity, through investment banks. Governments must formulate a sound policy that provides banks some form of financial package every time they extend loans to distressing automakers. Moreover, it is equally important that governments refrain from adding new expensive vehicle regulations for a specified number of years so that the distressing companies will be given ample time to recuperate their financial problems.

For the automobile companies that survived the impact of the recession, it is likewise important that they carefully plan for the unpredictable future by formulating innovative approaches in almost everything they execute. Companies must make sure that the new approaches include their system of reporting to the investment community and to the stakeholders as well as their decision making process, particularly on the legal and tax structures in depressed markets. Companies must additionally rethink their business structure completely to get rid of complexity that suppresses innovation and hinders their competitiveness.

Hence, it is important for the automobile companies to have transparent and clear communication of outlooks, risk exposure, and management strategy. It is likewise very important for them not to apply their established transfer pricing guidelines during this unstable economic condition due to the unpredictable automotive market. Finally, companies should evolve and grow from their crisis experience through the simplification of their business model in order to improve their viability.

Conclusion
The automotive industry crisis that transpired between 2008 and 2010 that affected many countries around the world was basically the consequence of the global financial recession, along with the oil price increases and publics new expectations on automobiles. During these times, the worldwide automobile sales started to drop sharply, making the period a low point in terms of overall profitability of the automotive manufacturers. As a result, many of the American- and European-based manufacturers filed for bankruptcy because of the admitted fact that they have not properly managed their capital, time, and products. The sales of Chrysler, General Motors, and Ford, otherwise known as the Big Three, which were historically the giants of the worldwide automotive industry, have significantly declined at the onset of 2008. Meanwhile, the sales of European manufacturing companies such as Opel, Porsche, and Mercedes have been likewise negatively affected by the crisis that took place during the past months.

However, unlike in the United States and Europe, automobile manufacturers in Asia were not significantly affected by the problems experienced during this time. In fact, Asian carmakers have strongly invaded the markets of the United States and Europe that resulted in the significant drop in market shares of American and European automakers. Despite the efforts these American and European manufacturers, they still found themselves on the boundary, thus forcing them to petition their governments for funding to continue their operation. In view of this, it is undeniable that the consequence of the global financial crisis was indeed principally experienced by American and European American automobile manufacturing industry seeing that many of their automobile companies were driven to the threshold of bankruptcy.

The neoclassical axioms placed on individual preferences have been criticized as overly restrictive

Disciplines of economics, like those in philosophy, have their own special methods of analysis. Philosophy and economics when combined lead to fruitful and powerful results which can only be achieved when the two fields give synergy to each other. Criticism is an important aspect of developing a sound understanding of economical environment so as to cultivate the quality the field of economics requires in order to serve the dynamic world. For instance, the neoclassical maxims placed on individual inclinations have been criticized as excessively limiting hence bringing a challenge among the scholars to do a review on the concept. Neoclassicism has been identified by unsophisticated critics with models in which all the agents are entirely informed or sometimes rational instrumentally. Sometimes, the neoclassicism definitions on the basis of methodological individualism has been referred to as excruciatingly selfish which can only be linked back to the years of 1950s and never comparable anywhere closer in the modern age. As of today, the definitions on individual preferences leaves all the modern economic theories out of their proper meaning hence giving more power to the rejoinders of the mainstream. In the last three decades, the neoclassical economics has experienced an explosion of models where economic actors are often informed in an imperfect way and sometimes frequently irrational or what may be termed as bounded rational.

Although there have been numerous theoretical advances in the economic circles, none of these brilliant ideas have saved the neoclassical ship from its methodological dock it still retains its roots strongly within the broadminded social science of individualism. The problem of individual preference is that of the analytic and synthetic type which requires the socioeconomic scrutiny to fully understand the functioning at the individual level. This understanding of the socio economic phenomenon at the individual level will then be translated in the understanding of the modern complex social phenomena. However, this seems unlikely since the neoclassical axioms centered on individual preferences have been too restrictive.

Neoclassical economics has been thought of a methodological individualism where the ideology of socioeconomic explanation has to be sought at the individual agent level. However, there are two things to note about such analysis based on individual preference. First, the analysis was never the method used by prominent classical economists such as David Ricardo and Adam Smith neither did Keynes or Hayek apply the methodology. The second point to note is that the axioms have been applied predominantly in the mid of the 19th century as the Anglo Celtic liberal individualism. The Anglo Celtic liberal individualism imposes a tight differentiation between structure and agency thus insisting that the socioeconomic elucidations have to follow a specified channel from agency to structure. This imposition has been done axiomatically and the structure is often understood as the crystallization of the past acts of the agents.

The strict separation in the Anglo Celtic liberal individualism is essential in not only by definition but also in undermining the neoclassicism recent claims. It is undoubtedly right to argue that the neoclassicism in essence subscribe to the individualism methodology. In addition, the mainstream economists have often acknowledged that the agent is the social context creation thus the individual and the social structure are scrappily entwined with their models retaining the distinction and placing the burden of the elucidation on the individual. This indeed is overly restrictive scenario which gives no room for a wider approach.

The reason why this approach of individual preferences has received a wider criticism is because the effort of an individual worker is modeled nowadays as a function of unemployment in the sector such as the wage models efficiency. There seems to appear some interesting linkages between the macro phenomenon and micro agent (individual) but still the explanatory trajectory maintains that there has to be a unidirectional way of relating this phenomenon, from the agent to the social structure. The neoclassical theory is basically concerned with the problems of equilibrium enjoying economy at maximum employment. It is a theory concerned with an investment determined by savings, marginal rates of substitution and marginal utility.

The neoclassical axioms placed on individual preferences has received significant criticism and what might seem to be an advance on the neoclassical consumer theory is the revealed preference theory which is a method through which a possibility of discerning consumer behavior on the ground of variable incomes and variable prices is liable.  In revealed preference theory, a consumer with some given income will be able to buy a variety of products with the change in income implying that the variety of goods and services which will be transacted are also bound to change with the change in consumer income.

It is apparent that a consumer will only select a combination of goods and services which tend to be a little bit cheaper and discriminate on the expensive combinations. In other words, the consumer will try to relate on the previous choices of combinations and ensure that the current mixture do not surpass in cost. In this perspective, the revealed preference theory can be termed as the improvement of the neoclassical consumer theory. The revealed preference theory intentionally abandons the values of indifference and utility. However, the theory is an empirical utility in the field of economics which supersedes the primary utility that was originally set in consumer theory.

The neoclassical consumer will always maximize the utility and will make choices by fully preordering the feasible options and weighing the options when things are looking indifferent. The consumer can also choose the alternatives when indecisive or indifferent without the need to preorder the options or exhaust his or her budget. There is need for the preferences therefore not to be complete, non satiated or transitive although the preferences are assumed to be strictly adaptive and convex. The revealed preference theory provides the modern axioms which parallel the ideology of ambiguity aversion in the choices under uncertainty.

Preference or sometimes referred to as taste has often been applied in social science disciplines and it is also a term commonly used in economics. In consumer theory per se preference is related to the consumer demand curves through the budget constraints and indifference curves. The typical models which make up the consumer theory are utilized to represent visionary observable patterns of demand for an individual buyer on the constrained optimization hypothesis. With the assumption that prices are constant and there is a fixed income the indifference curves will behave differently. However, the modern economics looks at the changing trends of price change of products and the change of income which can better be elucidated in the theory of revealed preference. Here, the consumer may choose whichever point, either above or below the line of budget constraint. The line is usually diagonal. The whole concept explains that the amount spent on products is less or equal to the consumers income. Therefore, the consumer will tend to choose the point in the indifference curve where the utility is highest within the budget constraint.

The effect of income changes and those of price changes address issues on the change of price of products and the overall change in consumption of the products in the market. It is the theory of consumer preference which examines the decisions and trade offs which individuals make as consumers relative to their income and price changes. The consumer determines how the market price of products can be determined and the products which will be bought. With the changes in income, prices in the market tend to keep an unstable state they can either go up or go down. However, this does not apply to all forms of products in the market. There are exceptions of goods which may not obey this trend although the discussion on these goods is not the scope of this paper.

The theories of economics have been of importance in understanding the behavior of the market and especially the consumer who is the centre stage of an economist. An economist is interested on understanding the reasons behind the increase or decrease in consumer capability to buy a certain commodity in the market. With reference to this, several theorists came up with ideas which are even used in the modern economics. However, the theories are not devoid of criticisms-challenges are abundant and these have enabled the sound understanding of consumer behavior. The growth of classical economics to neoclassical economical was as a result of the criticisms, and then came the revealed preference theory which strengthened the neoclassical consumer theory.

The neoclassical economics in deed comprises of an array of several schools of thought which the field of economics address. However, a lot of controversy has been felt over a number of years on the true definition of neoclassical axioms in the field of micro economical analysis. These controversies have probably resulted because of the difference in the approaches to different problems of economics. These problems which are addressed include the neoclassical theories of labor and the demographic changes in neoclassical theories. There are three basic assumptions in the field of neoclassical economics. The first assumption is that individuals always have rational preferences among the consequences which can be identified and related to value. The second assumption is that individuals fully take advantage to maximize utility and firms will always work very hard to maximize their profits. The last assumption is that individuals will always act independently on the level of relevant and full information. The three paradigms of neoclassical assumptions have built a framework to better understand the process involved in allocating scarce resources among the alternative ends. The understanding of these alternatives is the main concept addressed in economics to every neoclassical theorist. A problem which is solved in neoclassical economics is the excellence in allocation of scarce resources with the various powers and needs remaining a variable factor. An individual who has a certain size of land and other resource materials will be challenged on how to employ different tools in production. The factors of production can be labor, capital, entrepreneur or land which must be applied to maximize the utility of production.

The basic assumption of the concept of neoclassical economics is derived from a diverse range of theories which explain various activities in economic setting. For instance, the concept of maximizing profits is basically the issue to do with the firms neoclassical theory. On the other hand, the concept of deriving demand curves comes to an appreciative of consumer goods. The supply curves also allow the analysis of various factors of production which must be applied appropriately to enhance good operation of production process.

The origin of consumption theory of neoclassical economics is the concept of maximizing utility, the derivation of reservation demand and labor supply curves and the demand curves for consumer goods derivation. The idea of market and supply is soaked in the minds of entrepreneurs who try to maintain a balance between the factors in order to run businesses in an appropriate way. The interaction between market supply and demand will determine the price and the equilibrium output. The process of deriving the market and demand for every factor of production is analogous to the process of deriving the factors of production for the final market output. In both perspectives, the necessity of determining the income distribution and the equilibrium income is emphasized. In the output market the factor demand incorporates the relationship of the marginal productivity of the factor in question.
Basically, neoclassical economics stresses the concept of equilibrium and the equilibrium is the answer to the problems of maximizing profits. The economical regularities are always made clear by the methodological individualism, a concept which suggests that economical issues can be illustrated by the keen study of the behavior of an agent. This emphasis is mainly typical to the area of microeconomics.

Population Problems in China

China is a country in the world that faces several severe problems with respect to the population it harbors. Its population is one of the largest in the world, bordering around 1336.6 million people, with estimates claiming that it will reach 1.557billion by the year 2043 First of all, the government has taken upon itself the tedious task to ensure (albeit ridiculously) that population growth is controlled. However, in this very act and intention lies Chinas greatest population related problem. Instead of ensuring that couples are educated and know how to plan their families, the government took a shortcut and passed a law to the effect that no couple I allowed to have more than one child  the One Child Policy.

This law is ridiculous and ineffective due to several reasons. The very first of these reasons is the fact that no one can control how many children they are destined to have. Despite several measures at human level, nature may have other plans for the couple, which no one else, not even the government has the right to punish and penalize the couple for. Secondly, in the case that the first child that a couple has may (god forbid) turn out to be less than normal as far as his or her growth or health is concerned, and the couple wish to have another child for spiritual fulfillment and for the sake of the first child, if they are not allowed to do so due to the law being in place, it becomes difficult for the family to deal with the shortcomings of their only child. This not only disappoints the couple in their own ability to conceive a healthy child, but eventually psychologically brings the family down in their morale. Thirdly, in case of twins being born, a scenario which is out of control of both parents, the doctors, as well as the government, it makes no sense to penalize the couple for the situation by demanding them to give away one child or worse, get rid of one of the twins. Who decides which twin to get rid of Who decides to force an abortion None of these choices are ethically correct, and even if they were viable options, only and only the parent(s) should be allowed to decide the future of their family. Birthrate laws and family planning is something that the government should educate about and provide necessary facilities regarding it, not decide people fate against their wishes for them. China may have the largest population (of 1133.6 million) (Rosenberg, 2004), but that gives no one, not even the government of China, to enforce inhumane laws on its civilians. The biggest problem with Chinas population thus is that its government has taken violating the civil rights of the Chinese citizens to a whole new unacceptable extreme. It is a wonder that the United Nations and the rest of the world platform is a silent spectator to this brutality.

Another problem with regards to population that China faces is its ever increasingly disproportionate population as far as gender is concerned. Additionally, China is expected to face several other population related problems such as stress on its resources (agriculture and energy supplies), infrastructure and housing (AFE.Asia), as well as education resources, not to mention newborn sex disproportion (which China has already started witnessing) as well as population aging (2004). Population Aging can be most easily explained in layman terms as the situation where more and more newborn babies keep getting born, and the older generations do not die out. This creates population congestion, with people who lie at two extremes of the population  the very young and the very old. The parents of the very young are busy earning for their off spring, and thus there is no youth as such to take the country forward.

Furthermore, the fact that eastern China houses more than ninety percent of Chinas population does not help population matters, especially when the population from eastern China wants to migrate to western China in order to pursue better living standards. These standards can be gauged from the fact that the population density in eastern China is around 236 people per sq. km, while that in western China is hardly 11 people per sq. km.

Economy in U.S. Probably Shrank More Than Previously Estimated

The performance of a countrys economy is based on the comparison between the performances in the period of consideration with the previous period. For instance, the article highlights that according to economists GDP in U.S dropped at a rate of 5.4 in the fourth quarter. This was the worst pace of contraction since 1982 .The economists further project that the drop is a direct consequence of the increasing unemployment levels as companies try to cut down on the production costs. Consumer spending also contributed to the contraction of the U.S economy. It is worth noting that consumer spending contributes 70 of the U.S economy. Consumer spending recorded an al time low when it contracted by an estimate of 3.8. A reduction in the level of inventories by 1.3 was also major contributor of the decline in economic. Final contributor to the contraction of U.S economy was the exports which economists estimated to have shrinked by 6 (Homan, 2009).

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a measure of how the economy of a country is performing. It sis usually the dollar value of all goods and services produced within a country over a specified period of time. It is normally the summation of consumption, investment, government spending and net exports.

Consumption is the largest component of GDP and in comprises of the private household expenditures. Consumers do spend on durable, on-durable goods and services.  It is often affected by the job cuts and increasing inflation levels. In that, the purchasing power of individuals is minimal especially when one is unemployed. However, the latest recession saw consumer spending record mild slow down due to the use of credit card debt by consumers. Finally, it should be noted that, a decline in consumer spending has direct impact on the employment levels within a country. In that, if the supply of commodities outnumbers the demand chances are that manufacturing industries will close some of the production units cut on the production costs (Homan, 2009). To cut on the production costs will involve the elimination of any redundant labor which will be economical to work with in the short run.