Effectiveness of inflation targeting regime in UK

Inflation targeting is a monetary policy regime adopted by the central bank where the bank estimates a target or projected inflation rate and makes public it target rate. Where inflation targeting regime is adopted the central bank attempt to steer inflation toward the targeted rate. The interest rate is the main monetary policy tool used to control inflation rate in order to achieve a targeted rate. Due to the inverse relationship between interest rate and inflation rate the move by the central bank to raise or lower interest rate become more transparent.

When the bank project future inflation to be higher than the target rate, it raises the interest rate in order to bring down inflation. On the other hand where future inflation is expected to be below the target rate the bank is more likely to lower the interest rate.

However the relationship between interest rate and inflation rate is not direct. When interest rate is lowered the borrowing cost reduces and this induces the private sector and the household to increase borrowing. This in turn increases aggregate demand forcing prices of good and services to increase. On the other hand rise in interest rate discourage borrowing forcing the household and private investors to cut spending and consequently prices falls (Mishkin, 2001).

Inflation targeting was first adopted in New Zealand in 1990 and latter other countries such as the UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Ireland, Czech Republic and South Africa adopted the policy. However the implementation of the policy vary from  one country to the other as some country such as the UK have adopted a single point estimate as their targeted rate while others use a range e.g. 2-3 as the targeted rate.

The major difference between inflation targeting regime and other monetary policy regime such as the exchange rate and monetary targeting is that while such policies target intermediate variables in an effort to provide price stability, inflation targeting involves targeting a forecasted value of inflation thus commonly referred to as inflation forecasting targeting (Bernanke, Thomas  Mishkin, 1999).

Increased use of inflation targeting by developed and developing economy led to abandonment of managed or fixed exchange rate and provide a frame work for lowering inflation without hampering economic growth. In implementing and ensuring successful operation of inflation targeting regime the following condition should be fulfilled.
Lack of fiscal dominance or strong fiscal policy

Predictable capital inflow usually leads to successful inflation targeting
Strong financial institution such as security market, commercial banking and independent central bank. Lack of well developed financial market lead to limited monetary policy instrument and with limited instrument the central bankmonetary authority will have limited ability to fine tune policy.
The monetary policy transmission mechanism should be understood and predictable.
eliminating other policy objectives or nominal anchors that may lead to conflict in attaining inflation target ensuring transparency during implementation of monetary policy action and communicating the various action to the public

The bank of England
In UK the bank of England is responsible for implementation of inflation targeting. The two major role of the bank are financial stability and monetary stability. The bank gained statutory responsibility of setting official interest rate in 1997. Monetary stability mainly deals with ensuring that prices remain stable and people have confidence in currency. The bank ensures that economic growth is non inflationary. The currently monetary policy framework has outlined the price stability objective which is in two main elements

Annual inflation target as set out by the government
Commitment to open and accountable policy making
The bank of England decides the level of short term interest rate that will meet the target level of inflation rate which is currently 2 (king, 1997).

Setting of interest rate
The interest rate that the bank uses to meet inflation target is set by a special committee known as the monetary policy committee. The monetary policy committee consists of nine members, four appointed by the chancellor i.e. they are external members and the rest from the bank of England. The committee is chaired by the governor of the bank of England. The monetary policy committee meet twice per month and decision are made by voting on the basis of one man one vote. The treasury is also represented by one member at the meeting but he is not allowed to vote.

Once decision on interest rate is made, announcement is made on the following day at 12 noon. On the second week after the meeting a record of vote and minutes of the meeting are published. Inflation reports are published by the bank of England in each quarter. This report provides in detail the prevailing economic condition, expected economic growth and inflation rate agreed by monetary policy committee. Besides publishing of inflation report, the bank also publishes other material to increase understanding and awareness of it monetary policy functions.

The committee has to explain it action regularly to the treasury committee in parliament. Members of the committee also visit different region of the country in order to explain their policy decision and also to gather information about the economic situation from organizations and businesses.

How inflation targeting works
The monetary policy committee decides on an interest rate that will achieve a targeted inflation rate. This interest rate is used by the bank of England to lend to financial institution. This rate affects the setting of interest rate by building society, commercial banks and other financial institutions for their borrower and savers. Change of interest rate has also an impact on price of shares, bonds and other financial asset. The exchange rate is also affected by changes in interest rate and ultimately the business and consumer demand is affected.

When interest rate is reduced borrowing become more attractive and saving less attractive and the net effect will be an increase in aggregate spending. Assuming the Keynesian equation on national income
Y  G  C  I  (X-M)
Where Y  national income (GDP)
G  government spending
C  household consumption
I  private investment
X  export
M  import

Reduction of interest rate encourages the household and private investors to increase spending.  The two being component of GDP causes an increase in national income. In a case where the economy is responsive to increase in aggregate demand i.e. the economy is not at full employment level increase in aggregate demand would not only create addition to output but would cause inflation as well. A trade-off would exist between changes in the level of output and employment and changes in the level of price (Mishkin, 2001).

On the other hand an increase in interest rate has the effect of reducing aggregate demand and price. This can be explained using the graph below

Aggregate demand and aggregate supply diagram

    Price

AS P1 P2 AD1 AD2 Q2     Q1 quantity

Increase in interest rate leads to a decrease in aggregate demand from AD1 to AD2 which also forces output to drop from Q1 to Q2 and prices from P1 to P2 i.e. the level of employment at Q2 is lower than at Q1, associated with lower employment level is lower price level or some level of deflation.

The overall effect of monetary policy is more rapid when it is credible. There is always a time lag involved before change of interest rate affect saving and spending and ultimately changes in consumer price. It is not possible to be precise about the timing and size of these channels but the maximum effect on output is expected to be felt after one year while changes in consumer prices are expected after two years following changes in interest rate (bofinger, 2002).

The bank target an inflation of 2 which is expressed in term of annual rate of inflation based on consumer price index. The aim of the bank is not to achieve the lowest level of inflation, an inflation rate below the target rate of 2 is considered as bad as inflation rate above the target. Where the bank misses the target by more than 1 on either side e.g. when inflation of 1 or 3 is achieved the governor of the bank must write an open letter to the chancellor of exchequer explaining why the inflation rate has fallen or increased, how long the discrepancy is expected to persist and measures undertaken by monetary policy committee to steer inflation back to target.

It is worth noting that when the bank of England adopt inflation targeting regime, it is not only responsible for maintaining price stability but also responsible for achieving other monetary policy objectives e.g. exchange stability, higher employment levels, increase in capital accumulation, and increase in the rate of economic growth.

Effectiveness of inflation targeting
Assessment of the effectiveness of inflation targeting in UK will be done against the main macro economic indicators i.e. inflation, gross domestic product (GDP), and unemployment rate.

Inflation rate
The trend in inflation rate for the last 15 years is illustrated by the following graph

Source Office of national statistics

As illustrated by the above graph the adoption of inflation targeting since 1992 has enabled the U.K to achieve stable and low inflation rate. Since 1996 the bank of England has maintained inflation below 2.5 however from the beginning of 2004 the growth of the housing sector due to availability of credit led to increase in house price. This fed inflation in the economy and there was a steep increase in prices which reached peak in mid 2008 hitting 3.6 mark. The busting of the housing bubble in 2008 coupled with the spill over effect from the US sub prime mortgage market and downturn in the housing market forced prices to drop. The global financial crisis which started in 2008 has reduced demand for good and services all over the globe and this forced inflation to decrease from 2008 to the end of 2009. Furthermore the closure and downsizing of business that has been evident during the crisis increased unemployment and with less income the household had to cut on spending thereby reducing aggregate demand and price. To prevent the economy from sliding into recession the bank of England had to reduce interest rate by more than 50 basis point to as low as 0.5. Reduction of interest rate together with quantitative easing has helped to accelerate spending and at the same time causing increase in prices and by February 2010 inflation had climbed to 3.1.

Economic growth
The economic growth is illustrated by growth in gross domestic product (GDP). The following graph indicated the growth in GDP for the last 15 years.

LINK Excel.Chart.8 GmaterialCopy of ir10feb3 INFLATION.xls Chart4 a p
Source Office of national statistics

The monetary policy adopted by the bank of England has facilitated economic growth for the last fifteen years. Although there was a fall in GDP in year 2002, the UK economy was better compared to other large EU countries. The sound macro economic framework which emphasize on transparency, accountability and responsibility coupled with the independence of the bank  in pursuit of symmetrical inflation target has enabled it to respond appropriately to cyclical fluctuation including the recent global financial crisis. As a result of slowdown in aggregate demand the bank had to cut interest rate in order to stimulate demand. This led to reduction of interest rate from as high as 5 in the beginning of 2008 to as low as 0.5 by the end of 2009. The bank has not revised the rate upward since there is no fear of inflation as demand is still low. Due to this cut in interest rate the economy has shown some sign of improvement in 2010 as illustrated by growth in GDP.

Employment
For the past 15 years unemployment rate has been decreasing but by the end of 2008 unemployment rate started to increase due to the global financial crisis which led to downsizing and closure of business.

Unemployment rate for the past fifteen years is illustrated in the following graph

INCLUDEPICTURE httpnewsimg.bbc.co.ukmediaimages47488000gif_47488258_unem_claims_466gr_new.gif

MERGEFORMATINET
As indicated by the graph above it is clear that the inflation targeting regime has enabled the country to maintain low unemployment rate. Though the rate of unemployment increased from 2008, the rate was below other developed nation such as the US. The increase in unemployment rate from 2008 was due to global financial crisis and was not a problem unique to the UK as most countries across the globe also experienced increase in unemployment rate.

As illustrated by the above macroeconomic variable it is evident that inflation targeting regime adopted by the bank of England has enabled the country to maintain stable and low inflation. In addition the growth in the economy coupled with low unemployment rate further attest to the fact that the policy has been effective in the last 15 years.

PRODUCER PRICE INDEX

The Producer Price Index, also known as the Wholesale Price Index until 1978, is considered to be a chief indicator of a countrys economy. It is the weighted index of prices at the wholesale, or the producer level.  In other words, it measures the change in the selling prices for the output produced by the local producers only.  Hence, it shows the movement of the wholesale prices relative to a base period (BLS, 2009). For example The UK PPI measures the movement of the goods and services produced by the UK manufactures.

A variety of the goods are selected and the prices of the respective goods are then gathered each month. The change in the price of the respective goods is then weighted to mirror the relative importance of the goods in the current year. These values are then added for different sectors to give the required index.  This is the concept behind the producer price index.

The Producer Price Index release usually shows the index figures for three different goods Crude, Intermediate and Finished (Barnes, 2010).

PPI Commodity Index (Crude) It measures the change in the selling prices of the producers for products such as energy, crude oil and coal.

PPI Stage of Processing (SOP) Index (Intermediate)  It measures the change in the selling prices of the producers for commodities that have are semi-processed and have been passed along to another producer for further value addition. It includes goods such as cotton, steel and diesel fuel.

PPI Industry Index (Finished) It measures the change in the selling prices of the producers for the finished goods and forms the basis of the core PPI. This figure is usually considered to be the most significant for its greater relation to the state of economy. It is calculated as the finished goods index less the food and energy component indexes. This is because these components are considered to be volatile and mislead the real PPI figure.

The movements in this index are interpreted with respect to a base year which is usually awarded the base level of 100. A PPI index of 120 would be interpreted as an increase of 20 in the prices of the commodities whereas a PPI index of 70 would mean a 30 decrease in the prices of the commodities since the base year.

With the help of the producer price index, the investors are able to predict the consumer price index. This is because the cost increases are most of the time passes along to the consumers. Therefore, the price change at the PPI level would greatly help in estimating the price change at the consumer front. At the same time, the governments can use the PPI figures to develop the policies to combat inflation in the nation. It can also use to predict the GDP deflator (Barnes, 2010).

PPI, at the same time, has some major limitations. It does not include all types of goods and services being produced in the economy. There are some forms of industries that are incorporated in this index and hence, the index does not reflect on the whole economy. This type of index can be distorted by the inclusion of more volatile industries such as crude oil and energy. Therefore, it is a biased index to some extent (Barnes, 2010).

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CPI AND PPI
PPI measures the change in the price level from the sellers point of view whereas the CPI measures the change in the price level from the perspective of the buyer.  This is basic difference between the two indexes.

Both the indexes, PPI and CPI, determine the price changes over the time for products and services, but they differ at two important fronts. One is the type of the products and services included in each index and the other is the nature of the prices collected for the respective goods and services.

The composition of the PPI includes all types of goods and services produced in the country. It includes the semi-processed goods that serve as an input to other producers or as capital investments as well as all the finished goods produced locally. This index does not include the imports of the country since they are not locally produced. On the other hand, the CPI includes all the goods and services that are bought to be consumed by the respective countrys households. Therefore, it also includes the imports that are being consumed or used (BLS, 2009).

In the PPI measure, the income received by the producers in taken into account. Hence, it does not include the sales and excise taxes that are added after the production. On the other hand, the CPI includes the price paid by the consumers directly. Therefore, it includes the sales and excise taxes paid the households as well (BLS, 2009).

MONITORING OF PPI BY THE GOVERNMENT
The indexes are important measures for all the governments to develop future policies and strategies for the country. It allows them to separate the change caused by the greater production of goods and services from the change caused by the higher prices. The increase in production of the commodities is beneficial for the economy and leads to a better standards of living. On the other hand, the increase due to prices is not beneficial but leads to inflation in the economy. Hence, it results in a lower standard of living and less economic activity.

The producer price index reflects on the cost of production of goods and services. An increase this index is likely to cause an increase in the retail prices across the nation. Hence, studying this index forewarns the government of the resulting inflation and allows them to develop strategies to combat this surge in prices. At the same time, monitoring the PPI will help the government to develop policies for financially supporting the business with increasing cost of production through subsidies, grants, tax concession and other funding.

My Government currently monitors the PPI for the following purposes
Observes and measures the inflation rate for the manufacturing sectors within the economy during different stages.

Uses it as a deflator to change the values of major economic indicators to constant prices.

CPI AND GDP DEFLATOR
The consumer price index is a measure that reflects on the changes in the prices of the fixed basket of the goods and services including housing, electricity and food. In the case of Consumer Price Index, the movements of this index from one date to other measures the relative change in the price level. With the reference date index at 100, an index of 110 at later date would be interpreted as a 10 increase in the price of the respective basket of goods and services. On the other hand, the GDP deflator mirrors the average level of price prevalent in the current economic system. At the same time, the measure also indicates the level of economic activity in the country (Samuelson, 1998).

The GDP deflator appears to be more accurate and precise measure for the inflation rates and other macroeconomic indicators. Hence, the economists and the market analysts prefer it over the CPI based inflation rates.

Both the CPI and the GDP deflator estimate the rate of inflation. The GDP deflator considers the unlimited amount of substitution of the more expensive good with the less expensive goods so it underestimates the rate of inflation. On the other hand, the CPI considers zero substitution and hence overestimates the rate of inflation. Therefore, both are imprecise estimators of inflation. (Samuelson, 1998).

CPI and GDP deflator both estimate the rate of inflation with the same preciseness.  But there is slight difference between the measures of the inflation and their abilities. The CPI uses a fixed basket of goods. In this case, the quantities of the goods consumed in the two years being compared remains the same whereas the prices of these commodities changes. On the other hand, in GDP deflator the prices of the commodities remain the same in the two years being compared while the quantities and the basket of goods are flexible. In this case, the basket changes with the changes in the consumption and the investment patterns of the people of the country (Samuelson. 1998).

At the same time, the CPI mirrors the prices of the basket of goods that represents the purchases of the consumers whereas GDP deflator imitates the prices of all the goods that are produced locally.

Overview of Indo British Trade in accordance with the New Trade Theory (NTT)

New Trade Theory (NTT)
International free trade ensures increasing returns and this leads to better business benefits. From the perspective of achieving better business and trade NTT is indispensible for the nations. For internationally presenting a product it is mandatory to remain adherent to the standards. So, until a product is internationally accepted, the nations should shelter it.

So, it can be said that the New Trade Theory explains that a product which can complete internationally should be offered for trade purposes. The assumption of diminishing returns to scale is challenged by NTT. The protectionist nature to focus upon specific sector indeed helps to carry on innovation to provide best products in the international market. This happens only as per the Network effect. Networking takes place among nations.

For example, during mid Fifties the Japanese Automobile industry was challenged. It was not possible for Japan to manufacture all the parts. Most of the ancillary industries were located overseas and in other nations. But after initiation of a different model of trade, the nation produced all spare parts and accessories that were required by the automobile industries. Thus the nation protected the automobile industry, and started exporting vehicles of all sizes.

The idea of protecting new industry was not a new concept but it has been executed from the end of 1880s, the NTT or New Trade Theory ensures a better and mathematical economical result. The profits from better trade effect were visible after NTT was explained judiciously. Creation of networking with different nations leads to better returns of scale. The model of New Trade Theory has been technical and the possibilities were clearly predictable.

Following the New Trade Theory (NTT) and several free trade practices both the countries have been largely benefited. The trade relations have considerably grown and several new business associations have established.

The New Trade Theory was proposed by Paul Krugman. The theory explained the fact that when a country produces a product that it best produces, it experiences a comparative advantage. A good service can be obtained with better benefits. As a result the production gets multiplied and with the maximized production better trade can be initiated. Determination of comparative advantage is indeed interesting. For example, when India can produce better wheat and United Kingdom can produce better power generating equipments, better production is possible if India focuses upon wheat production and United Kingdom emphasizes power generator production.

For nations with more labor and land it is best to go for the labor intensive production. On the contrary the nations with more capital can focus on mechanical goods that require investment. Trade with the purpose of welfare enhancing is indeed heartening as it influences global growth.  There are several propositions and models. In case of recent trade relations between United Kingdom and India it has been noticed that new theories of trade plays and important part. Following the theory that supports increasing returns to scale, it becomes easier to practice better trade relations.

New trade theory and its difference with earlier trade process

Increasing returns to scale (IRS) has been an important source of process wise gains In case of liberalized economies firms operate at lower costs. At the same time there remains higher level of output after trade and exchanges with trading nations. Liberalization usually increases trade and finally leads to better IRS. Many economists propose that protectionism indeed ensure better profitability. Protectionism is a major cause of coexistence of companies producing same goods. So, thus monopolies can be stopped. Besides, in the New Trade Theory it is possible for companies to enter the market without frictions. Long terms gains can be achievable as there remain better scope of price mechanism.

Increase in competition among the firms lead towards innovative technologies to ensure cheap and better products, this is with the purpose of prevailing better in the market. In case of conventional arguments it can be said that a nation fails to produce all goods and become self sufficient by following the New Trade Theory. Still, it is possible for a nation to boost up industries and increase the level and quality of production just by aiding. Thus, a nation that wants to export a product needs to ensure that the product is of global standard.

The following terms are essential to understand Indo-British trade terms better

Autarchy

This resembles no trade. There are Autarchic governments which attempt to eliminate all sorts of imports and exports. This force their subjects to live with indigenous products produced within the economy.

These governments in fact consider that all other cultures are against and evil or even corrupt. In case of contact with the people things can be antagonistic. Being a responsible government none of the government practices this and India and UK also do not follow this model of trade term.

Mercantilism
This concept of trade deals with the fact that trade for national advantage. Mercantilists consider that across the globe there are finite store of wealth so, when one country gets more automatically another nation is deprived. Mercantilists controls and restrict imports and always encourage subsidize exports. Japan is an example of a country that has taken this policy but neither India nor United Kingdom follows this model of trade.

Protectionism
Protectionist government restricts or tax imports to benefit domestic manufacturers and as a result there remain more jobs within the nation. Protectionists believe that there are benefits from keeping jobs at home. United Kingdom followed this model after Second World War and as a result domestic production was not at all challenged. This policy allows import of the goods that does not pose challenge to the domestic market.

Strategic Trade
Many governments allow and patronize domestic companies in production of military goods. Thus dependence upon the foreign companies for preparation of strategic items decreases. For example, United States fund aerospace division to carry out research and development.

Fair Trade
This is a new movement that aims to provide more of the profits from trading directly with the producers in the third world countries. This is likely only by using consumer preferences. With the purpose of helping people middlemen are removed in case of such trade policies, both United Kingdom and India are now following free trade policies to some extent. To be specific several policies of Britain are much indulgent towards free trade. Government policies can largely remove barriers to their implementation in a free market economy but in India several Governmental policies are followed.

Overview of the economy of United Kingdom
For enhancement of economic growth it is necessary to implement market simulation. Strategic mechanism is mandatory in terms of reaching and exploring the emerging markets. Nations usually attempt to build their economies with investments, industrial and trade incentives. These factors remain adhered to domestic consumption, export. India and United Kingdom follow inward-outward oriented strategies. Local investment and production are meant for domestic consumption and similarly the imports are used for consumption and production. With the advent of the global market place exports have become a significant determinant of national income.

For many decades India follow the pervasive system of industrial licensing. This in turn created a bureaucratic control over the countrys production system. Licensing has been abolished in India in 18 industries following the latest licensing model of Britain.

To ensure effective export promotion UK has balanced export promotion and import penetration. Earlier, UK failed to explore its opportunities. Great Britain was the centre of industrial revolutions and technological progresses have been immense. In the second half of the 19th century Britain failed to utilize major innovations.  The missed opportunity and experience facilitated the nation to understand and utilize the present available resources at their best. The New Trade Theory again clarifies the fact the mutual trade and best use of technological innovation is mandatory in case of all bilateral trade deals.

Earlier during the era of British Empire economy of United Kingdom was the largest in the world. As a country UK was the first to industrialize. Industrial Revolution has been one of the major historical events of the world. Till today UK is the sixth largest economy in the world in terms of purchasing power.

UK is a member nation of the G7, at present it is expanding to the G8 and G20. It is moreover the founding member of the Commonwealth Group. Commonwealth is an association formed by former British Empire states. In true sense the British Economy is globalised economies in the world. London, the capital city is considered being the largest financial center in the globe.
The British economy includes the economies of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Channel Isles and the Isle of Man and the part of the British Isles and have received the offshore banking status.

The Bank of England offered interest rates to 1.0 per cent by the end of the year 2008 a drop of 0.5 per cent was expected for most of 2009 and 2010. Budget deficit of UK has been of about 5.3 per cent of GDP in the year 2008. With diverse economic stimulus packages and several bank bailouts being worked on, it is expected to get bigger to 11.3 per cent of GDP in 2009 and then 13 per cent of GDP in 2010.

During 2008, UK had the 43rd largest relative national public debt, and it was 47.2 per cent of GDP. This number is likely to rise to 58.5 per cent of GDP by the year 2009 and 70 per cent of GDP in the year 2010. Inflation was low up to 3.6 per cent in the year 2008, but has dropped back after the economic collapse. It is expected to be 0.4 per cent in the year 2009 and 0.8 per cent in the year 2010. It had the 58th lowest inflation rate in the world by the end of 2008.

Rate of unemployment had reached 6.3 per cent in the UK by the end of 2008. (According to the Office of National Statistics, it reached close to 2 million unemployed). This figure is suppose to grow to about 8-10 percent. United Kingdom has the third highest current account shortfall in the world. It was of about US186 billion. Huge trade deficit in manufacturing sector forced the nation to become a net importer of energy. It runs 654.7 billion of imports (6th in the world) and 468.7 billion of exports (9th in the world export rankings).

United Kingdom has been the 2nd largest recipient of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the financial year 2007.

UK GDP related facts and figures
In the Europe, the UK economy is second largest and in the World it is 5th largest. During 2008, GDP growth was about 1.1 per cent. It has been probable to contract in future years. The expected GDP growth is of -3.2 per cent in 2009 and -1.1 per cent during 2010. Population of UK is of 61million and a GDP per capita is US37.4k, this indicates that UK is the 30th richest country in the planet.

Economic History of UK
The nation had the largest economy in the world. During nineteenth century the nation ruled about one quarter of the world as the British Empire. The countrys global trade system transported capital, people, resources and generated vast profits for the Empire. From the time of the World War II the British Empire has weakened by the costs of warfare. At the same time the Republic of Ireland left the United Kingdom.

Recently, there have been two distinctive phases of strong economic performance. The first was under the initiative of the Prime Ministership of Margaret Thatcher. Thatcher broke the unions and guided in free market reforms that helped the United Kingdom to shed its Sick Man of Europe mantle.

The second started from the time of the New Labour government. It came to power in 1997, with Gordon Brown serving as both as Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown and later Prime Minister, inheriting and expanding a period of continuous economic growth from 1992 to 2007.  During this time New Trade Theories (NTT) were executed for better benefits of the nation.

Economy of UK during 2001-2007
The UK experienced a boom in both stock market and housing between 2001 and 2007.
During the phase obtaining credit at affordable rates was cheap and easy. The regulation lax and rules were reconstructed. Mortgage rates increase a lot and it rose to about 125 per cent. House and real estate prices almost tripled in some areas during that time. It is worth mentioning that the London Stock Exchange (LSE) reached record highs.

The home prices started to fall in the third quarter of 2007 and since then it was the beginning of the decline. Actually the recession was well anticipated from the period. Banks experienced setbacks, Northern Rock was forced to turn to the Bank of England as lender of last option in September 2007, this was indeed as an effect of less financial capital. Government slowly initiated the process of nationalizing the banks.

Economy of UK during 2008
The bank Northern Rock was nationalized and thus British governments involvement in the financial sector increased.

Financial organizations like Bradford  Bingley, help Alliance  Leicester and HBOS were sold. And to provide capital, funding and underwriting of more than 400 billion GBP to both over-leveraged giants like RBS and Lloyds TSB were carried on. Barclays, HSBC and Standard Chartered etc also received governmental patronage.

During the time of second quarter of 2008 the UK was officially in recession. It was a massive setback as Sterling had dropped more than 30 per cent several against the other main currencies. It was the time of recession.

The consumer faiths upon the financial companies were downhill and at the same time the rate of unemployment was uphill. Retail sector was the next victim of recession. Few of the household names like Woolworths, Zavvi , Somerfield, TescoMFI, Adams and Waterfords Wedgewood entered into severe financial crisis.

Economy of UK during 2009
Things were unpredictable in the year 2009, though several economists suggested earlier that there might be betterment in the later parts of the year, the reality differed. The British economy was greatly declining. And it was declining at a rapid pace that it was predicted.

The nations all sectors faced recession and was struggling, with less consumer confidence, the housing market experienced a shock. Further, employment was not available. Manufacturing was carried on either at the lowest point, or was dropping quicker than ever before.

With the aim of overcoming blame for the recession and the fall, out from his prior statements that he had controlled the Boom and Bust cycle, Prime Minster Gordon Brown came with a major economic stimulus package for the nation. It has added to the existing high debt levels above 40 percent of GDP. This further led to the speculation that Britains sovereign debt ratings would be downgraded. This would further lower down the Sterling value.

Economy of UK during 2010 A forecast

In the year 2010 the conditions are improving and slowly the recession is getting supplemented. The strong governmental influence indeed made the scenario better.

It has been forecasted that during the year there will be a growth of about 0 to 5 percent.  With the median remaining within the -1 to -2 percentages., though most of the economists state about the remaining downside risks.

It is projected that The Bank of England Interest Rate, Inflation and the three month Treasury rate etc will remain under 1 per cent, under 1 per cent and 1.3 per cent respectively.

The budget balance is forecast to grow dangerously to -13 per cent of GDP, which would take UK national public debt above 70 per cent of GDP.

Fiscal and monetary policy of UK
During the first Quarter of 2009, the Bank of England has already lowered down the Interest Rates to a historic low of about 1.0 per cent. This has been again with a drop to 0.5 Further measures are almost certainly required, and this will include quantities easing, in other words printing more currency.

UK Real Estate, UK Property Market
Since 1992, the real estate and property market of the United Kingdom witnessed massive growth. It has been great that there were several changes in the economic conditions of the nation still this sector has been positively growing. Between the years 2000 and 2007 alone, many areas saw median prices trebling in worth. From the third quarter of 2007, prices came down each month it has reached record levels of price drops. There has been a record low in terms of new property sales.
At present market conditions have improved, prices have now dropped back to the affordable levels. There remain fears of further fall and associated issues like rising unemployment and reluctance among the financial organizations who offer assistance for lending or to continue to limit the market.

Tax System in UK  Overview
In the United Kingdom, tax is applied by both central and local governments. The Central Government accumulates taxes through Her Majesties Revenue and Customs (HM Revenue  Customs) department. The taxes are collected in the form of VAT (value added tax), income tax, National Insurance, corporation tax and fuel duty etc.

Overview of Indian Economy

In the year 1948 GAAT or General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was established in Geneva. India was the founder member of GATT. WTO or World Trade Organization has been Indias successor. Indias contribution in an increasingly rule based system in the process of international trade has been to ensure more stability and predictability.

Being within the parameters of liberalization multilateral trading system has been promoted by government of India. This helped the nation in balancing of trade with involvement of a third country. Before liberalization India has not faced the process and constraints of rapid expansion of trade. The policy of Most Favored Nation helped India to trade on a non discriminatory basis. Further, India has been able to consolidate disputes with the trading nations.

Better resource utilization and specialization of resources have been prominent in the last few years. This has bridged the gap that earlier prevailed between United Kingdom and India. Export expansion has been a major milestone. Agricultural goods of the nation along with agro based industries where exported in UK and other European countries. The process of export expansion has been further accelerated in the context of barrier less trade. This can be regarded as partial free trade.

New Trade Theory has been ideal for the nation and in the post liberalization period it has been noted that the nation enjoyed trade benefits as an effect of competitive advantage.   WTO (World Trade Organization) started functioning from early 1995 and this was an improvised version of Dunkel Draft. Dunkel Draft has largely expanded the opportunities of trade negotiations in services and agricultural products. This has been the prime basis of WTO formation.

The New Trade theoretical support has been the prime reason behind enormous growth of the Indian economy. Free trade ensures certain obvious and definite gains to the countries involved. At the same time employment in India has largely increased. In this context it can be mentioned that Indian IT giants influenced massive job growth in the United Kingdom during the fiscal year 2008-2009.  Similarly, Indian market witnessed requirement of both skilled and unskilled laboures. Both Britain and India have entered in to profitable bi lateral terms. These two nations utilized the trade theories to promote national economies.

The important characteristics of the GATWTO along with the Dunkel Draft frames basic overview of bilateral international trade terms. Both India and UK have overcome the serious short comings of these agreements. This has been possible as Indian economy was open for the UK based corporations and business houses after 1991.  The trend towards market lead globalization has been prominent during early 90s and at that point of time UK found Indian growing market open for trade and investment. The unequal competitions between nations get supplemented with the implementation of New Trade Theory. Obtaining the best product at the best rate is only possible by following the new theory of trade.

In the recent past after acceptance of liberalization policies India has been one of the top performers in the world economy but at the same time quickly rising inflation and the complexities of running the worlds biggest democracy are proving challenges to the Indian Government.

Indias economy witnessed a massive boom in last few years and even in the year 2007 the growth was of 9.2 percent. In the earlier year it has been 9.6 percent. Indian market growth has been the result of consistent markets reforms, and huge inflows of FDI. Besides these increasing foreign exchange reserves, massive boom in the IT and real estate sector helped in the flourishing of the capital market.

During global slowdown of 2008 India witnessed tough times, The Reserve Bank of India considered an inflation target as 4 percent. But in the mid of 2008 inflation was 11 percent and it was highest for the decade. The increasing prices of oil, food along with the resources essential for Indias construction boom plays an important role in this.

In the energy sector Indias growth has been remarkable and the nation has secured new fossil fuel from China. In the hunt of alternative and nonconventional energy the country has entered into a wide ranging nuclear agreement with the United States. This will reduce oil thirst.

With the purpose of combating inflation a tighter monetary policy is desired, but this will indeed help to lower the growth of the Indian economy, at the same time the domestic demand will be dampened. The external demand is also coming down further this increases the downside risks.

The stock market of India has fallen more than 40 during the first six months of January 2008. It is notable that 6b of foreign funds has gone out of the country during the period this has been the result of the slowing economic growth clubbed with the perceptions that the market was over-valued.
A massive change in the Indian trade policies have been reflected in the changing economic scenario of the nation. After following the New Trade Theories the economy structure of the nation have drastically changed. A per studies long term health of the Indian economy is right, and then this will be a needed rectification rather than a downtrend.

Indian Government emphasizes on long term growth and for this the proper infrastructure of the country as being prerequisite, 23.8 trillion rupee or 559 billion (approx) have been considered for better infrastructural growth of the nation. This was scheduled at the time of the 11th five year plan. It expects to provide fund to the 70 of the entire project costs, the other 30 being gets poured from the private sector. Numerous ports, roadways, airports and railways are all considered as vital for the Indian Economy. These areas have been prioritized and have been targeted for investment.

There remains a wide array of home bred companies in India who adds self confidence to the nation. There are several domestic companies in India that considerably contributes in the nations economic progress. These companies are also increasingly expanding in abroad. India has successfully contributed more new members to the Forbes Global 2000 than any other nations since last four years.

Recent Growth Trends in Indian Economy

Since last three years Indian Economy has largely grown, it has grown by more than 9 percent. In the last decade it has grown consistently by 7 percent. In turn this has been a large reason of poverty reduction. 10 percent of the poverty has been reduced. Still it is a fact that 60 percent of Indias 1.1 billion populations earning and depending upon agriculture. It has been a challenge for this population to deal with the droughts and floods. For the developing state of India poverty eradication is indeed a major challenge.

There has been a major structural transformation adopted by the national government in recent times. It has reduced growth constraints and has contributed greatly to the above all growth and prosperity of India. Still, there are still major political and bureaucratic issues around federal vs state bureaucracy, parallel economy, corruption etc. Indias public debt is of 58 percent of GDP, this is as per the studies of the according to the CIA World Fact book.

At the time of stable growth, the Indian service sector has greatly fared. The growth rate of this sector was 11.18 in the year of 2007 and at later it has also contributed 53 of GDP. Growth of the industrial sector has been of about 10.63 percent. Later it has increased to even 29 percent of GDP. Agriculture contributes to 17 of the nations economy.

The growth in the manufacturing sector has played the major role in generating the countrys excellent growth momentum. The growth percentage of the manufacturing sector rose progressively from 8.98 percent in 2005, to 12 percent in the year of 2006. The storage and communication sector also attained a noteworthy growth rate of 16.64 during 2006.

Several other factors that have contributed to this healthy environment are sustained in investment along with the high savings rates. In regard to the percentage of gross capital formation in GDP there has been a significant rise. This noticeable rise has been from 22.8 percent in the financial year 2001, to 35.9 percent in the financial year of 2006. In addition, the gross rate of savings as an amount to GDP registered concrete growth from 23.5 percent to 34.8 percent for the period.
Member of G20

India is part of the G-20, Group of Twenty.
India and UK, trade partner over centuries, influence of the colonial era


India has been a British colony for almost 200 years and it has achieved freedom during 1947. Though the nation achieved independence from the United Kingdom, the basic trade and economic policies of the nation have relevance with several British policies. In the recent past India and UKs trade terms underwent massive changes if compared to the colonial era. India was once perceived as a less developed country. It is now a fact that Indian economy changed fast and now it has transformed itself into the rapidly growing economy. In terms of growth Indian economy is fourth largest growing economy of the planet. India as a nation is fourth largest economy in purchasing power equality terms and UK is the 4th in GDP dollar terms. From UKs perspective India has been the 15th largest market for export. India has been the fifth largest nation in terms of exporting goods in developing countries. It is worth mentioning that export in India has been more than that of in China. India has been 25th largest exporter to the UK.

Synopsis of the Indo-British trade and utilization of the New Trade Theory (Present trade relations)

Indo- British trade terms have been substantial and till the financial year of 2002, United Kingdom has been the second leading trade partner. In the year 2008, trade terms with United Kingdom have been in the fifth position. Both in export and import trade terms have considerably grown. Indian exports readymade garments to United Kingdom which include gems and jewelries, leather, footwear, metal manufacturers, engineering products, power generating equipments, software related services, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, tea, rice, agricultural products and marine products. Besides products like preserved fruits, nuts and vegetables etc are also exported. In terms of import, India enjoys non-ferrous metals, gold, rough diamonds, telecom equipments, power generation equipments, industrial machinery, chemicals etc.

Overview of FDI and investments

In total FDI flows to India, UK is ranked as number 5. During the financial year 2003-2004, FDI has declined. It has been down from 366 US  million in 2000-01 to 167 US  million in 2003-04. Sectors where FDI has been remarkable are power, oil and gas, telecom, service industries etc.

Top sectors for UK FDI to India are currently power and oil and gas, telecom, and service industries. Recently there has been a major change in areas like biotech, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, automotive and other ICT and hi-tech. More and more bilateral cooperation is getting prominent among the two nations.

In the IT sector there has been vat changes, India at present is the second largest investor in the UK from Asia in the IT and ITES areas. This is in number of projects and in number of investments it is number eight. It is notable that Indian businesses in the UK increased about 47 in the year of 2003. It is about 28 new countries that opened operations in the UK during 2003. Flagships for Indian ICT such like Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) and Wipro have contributed a lot. Again, Reliance Infocomms 207 million acquisition of Flag Telecom along with Wockhardts 10.85 million acquisition of CP Pharmaceuticals can be considered  as the two largest Indian investments in 2003.

It is prudent to mention that in addition, leading Indian biotechnology companies have came in association with clients from UK. Astra Zeneca has set up an RD Centre in the city of Bangalore. Ranbaxy and GlaxoSmithKline have signed an agreement for combined research and development. Industry delegations from both the countries have visited each other.

At the same time, British oil and gas giants like British Gas, Shell and Cairns Energy have declared their plans to expand their operations in India. Many businesses have set up customer care offices in India.

Presence of UK Based companies in India gets prominence when the Information Technology sector. in India. India is well set as a preferred global hub for software development. In Business Process Outsourcing also it has attracted attention of many UK based companies.

Several other economic ties between UK and India

Along with trade and investment, UKs department for international development (DFID) assists the Government of India in achieving the deficiency and poverty reduction objectives. This procedure is in accordance with the Indian Government of Indias Tenth Plan. In compliance with the internationally agreed Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Britain aids India. This program substantiates the District Primary Education Programme (DPEP), health interventions (AIDS, TB, Polio) etc.

It is quite notable that the Trade and investment relations among the two nations have been greatly beneficial by numerous bilateral interactions between the two nations. An important association has been the India-UK Round Table. It has been a non-governmental body established in the year 2000. The purpose was to make recommendations for the development of bilateral relations of all aspects. Then, the 7th Meeting was held in Kolkata, India on10th January, 2004. In the year 2006-2007, India exported in 5.6 billion US  and in the next year 2007-2008 this rose to 7.0 billion US .  The areas of bilateral co-operations are as follows
Agriculture and Food Processing
Healthcare
Infrastructure
High Technology
IT
Energy

Later, an agreement was signed between India and UK named as The Prime Ministers Initiative. With this initiative, the new strategic ties among Britain and India were set up. This has been related to the areas like culture, education, Defense Policy etc. This also aimed to strengthen mutual economic and trade issues of these two nations.

United Kingdom has been a major trade partner of India. UK is Indias most economically significant trading partner with 18.7 percent of Indian exports reaches the EU. About 17.7 of the exports reach the Britain.  The Indo-British partnership for trade related to goods and services is now rising, also investment has never been enhanced with many Indian companies increasingly realizing that there is no restriction for the Indian professionals to work, acquire and operate in the UK.

Business to Business Relations

The UK India Business Council (UKIBC), earlier known as the Indo-British Partnership Network (IBPN) has been a major business organization supporting the growth of bilateral trade between the nations, and also the business and investment opportunities among the two countries.

Leading sectors that attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) from UK are as mentioned below

1. Telecommunications
2. Fuels (power  Oil refining)
3. Chemicals (other than fertilizers)
4. Services Sector (financial and non-financial)
India is considered to be the eighteenth largest market for trade and commerce. It is indeed the second largest country among the developing markets. Consumer class of India is rapidly expanding and at the same time economy of the nation is expanding at a pretty fast pace. Liberalization of the Indian economy is a process, with adaptation of the New Trade Theories,  NTT) the trade barriers mostly removed and the peak tariff down from 350 in 1991 to 20 in 2005. Privatization programs are slowly reducing significant role of the public sector in the production and consumption of goods.

Latest Trends

In the year 2010, Business Secretary Lord Mandelson and Indian Commerce Minister Anand Sharma have been involved in trade talks in London. This has further consolidated trade ties between the two countries.

Following the New Trade Theories energy and innovation related to the world-class knowledge economy can change life for millions in both the nations. It is proposed that both the nations will follow the procedures to ensure eco friendly trade and commerce. JETCO, The Joint Economic Trade Committee (JETCO) talks have been affirmative and decisions have been taken to initiate intense activity between the UK and Indian Governments for better trade terms.

Outcome of the UK-India trade talks of 2010

India has been one of the largest consumer markets of the globe and retail will be the key issue for UK. The retail sector of India has witnessed a growth of 10 of the Indias total GDP. On the other hand United Kingdom has experiences in management of supply chains that leads to better agricultural businesses. This might be suitable for the growth of Indian grains. As 35 to 40 percent of the grains are lost during transit in India, it is best to rely upon the supply chain process of the UK.
India has 80,000 kilometers of road that require either be increasing or constructing, and a UK-India roads group has been set up to carry out the work in a better way.  There have been special plans to turn Indian airdromes to better air hubs and UK will share technical expertise to make the process a successful venture. In the food and drink sector, India is the worlds largest market for whisky. 90 million cases are sold every year. Indian banks like ICICI and State Bank of India are expanding across the UK and UK based banks are eager to open up and expand operations in India.

Both United Kingdom and India shares a common interest in dealing with the global backlog of more than four million copyrights.

It is a fact that UKs bilateral trade with India is worth of about 12.6bn. The United Kingdom is the biggest European investor in India. More than 600 Indian firms are present in the UK.  About two thirds are in information technology. There remain scopes of employment as the new Indian IT players are opening up operations in the United Kingdom. In the year 2009 about 4000 new jobs have been created due to presence of Indian IT companies. All these trade terms are possible only as India has adopted the policy of liberalization.

New Trade Theory and growing trade relations between United Kingdom and India

Influence of the New Trade Theory has a strong impact upon the trade relations between United Kingdom and India. The New Trade Theory have been brainchild of researchers like Helpman (1981), Krugman (1979), and Lancaster (1980). This theory was proposed to supplement the traditional policies of trade. The global economic scenario considerably changed new theories were required to supplement the theories and data of World War II phase. Deardorff (1984) and Helpman and Krugman (1985) made it clear that the new trade theory was the result of three major facts
Concentration of trade among the industrialized nations

The uphill ratio of trade to GDP
Trade and business between the industrialized nations largely remained intra industry trade
With the proper execution and practice of New Trade Theory better economies of scale was achievable. The Indo- Britain trade is a great example of increasing trade relation between a developed and developing nation. After following the theories both the nations have been benefited. Relative trade with the developing countries increased as per the theory. In primaries, manufactures, and services the theories have become largely popular.

Indian market was liberalized and the New Trade Theories have largely contributed in the nations growth.  Indo- Britain trade practices increased and across sectors the benefits were prominent. On the verge of globalization New Trade Theory played an essential role in nurturing market expansion.
With implication of the theory both developing and developed nations have been benefited. Krugman Rose opined that there was a time when role of the developed nations were insignificant but with the proper implication of the new trade theories the dynamics of trade terms have changed.

It is a fact that a tropical country might produce banana better and on the contrary the technological and industrial devices might be in more production in the European nations with small areas for cultivation. In such a case if the tropical country focuses upon food processing and the European focuses upon technological innovation, then the production of both can increase. Finally, following the parameters of New Trade Theory with mutual trade and exchange of goods and products, better economies of scale can be achieved.

There remain several empirical grounds of trade liberalization. It is notable that in several conventional arguments that relates to the static and dynamic gains from liberalization comes out on the basis of fragile and conventional theoretical grounds. Though new trade theory deals with the account of many complexities of international trade, the logical thrust of many models justifies interference, such policy conclusions are rejected.

The monopolistic competition can be well supplemented with the principles of New Trade Theory. Monopolistic competition is a scenario where a manufacturer wants to create monopolies for the short run with the purpose of creating market power and finally profit. Control over the market price is essential to arrest monopolistic competition. Independent decision making might nurture monopolistic competition. So, in case of bilateral trade there remain less chances of any such competition. Free entry and exit from the market can be considered as another major feature of monopolistic competition.

With any unique product a company can enter the market and trade. In pursuance of positive profit there are companies that offer unique product. By following the New Trade Theories free entry and exit from the market can be regulated. At times the companies involved in monopolistic competition or MC has market power. In case of trade following the New Trade Theories, chances of developing market power remain lesser. With a product, trans national companies aim to make profit in a competitive trade scenario. This occurs as similar product might remain in the market as the nation might import similar product from other nations as well.

In India, several products offered by the UK based businesses are available. At the same time similar products from other nations and off course the products developed in the indigenous market are also available. So, in case of competition of making the market, less chances remains of monopolistic competition or MC. This is a major positive side of NTT.

Creation of brand name and brand consciousness is a major step towards developing market power. The leading global brands create advertisements to make their products better available to the common people. And persuasive advertising is a major process of creating brand awareness. Once the brand awareness is created, consumers eye to buy products or services from that particular brand.  So, creating a market is essential step for the global businesses.

In India, prior to liberalization it was difficult for the European and US based brands to offer products. But at present with the revision of the older trade terms companies hold 49 percent of the stake and collaborate with a local business to enter Indian market. In this regard it is worth mentioning that across the United Kingdom the Indian labors and workers find opportunities to work. As mentioned earlier, majority of the Information Technology related jobs generate in the United Kingdom only due to the presence of Indian IT companies and outsourcing giants like Tata Consultancy Services, Tech Mahindra, Infosys, HCL etc. Both UK and India have been immensely benefited with the implications of the New Trade Theories.

The growth of Indo-U.K. trade relations as claimed by both sides have been the biggest success stories that has been possible only Indias post-liberalization phase. There are crisis and several non publicized episodes as well, to be specific these remains almost in every nations that get involved in trade terms. There have been domestic politics, both in London and New Delhi but it is common and predictable in case of bilateral trade.

It is undeniable fact that Britain has emerged as Indias fourth largest trading partner globally, followed by and the second largest in entire Europe. The statistics state that trade in goods and services is worth of 8.7 billion Again, the Indian companies are the second largest investors in Great Britain, this is just next to America There are different 500 Indian companies, mostly these companies are in the IT sector, maintain offices in Great Britain and Britain is the third largest investor in India after 1991.Post liberalization phase began after 1991.

Indian market is emerging and for a nation like UK it is a positive side to get an edge to explore the growing markets. Similarly, the Indian capitals are also getting invested in the UK as Indian companies are largely opening up marketing and operations office in the UK.

With lesser protectionists attitude things have changed and reciprocal trade terms have consolidated bilateral trade terms between UK and India. However, one area of major concern is what the Indian often finds it difficult to move in due to visa constraints. This might be more relaxed with better benefits of both nations. Still, this is not at all clouding the Indo-British relations. Several special visa conditions have been proposed by UK to make trading further easier and simple. CII or Confederation of Indian Industries considers that visa conditions have become easier.

As India and the U.K. want to push forward their mutual engagement, these measures related to the visa processes are indeed bound to be counter-productive.

Indo- British trade is not confined within goods and services, in terms of diplomatic aspects both the nations have come forward. The wide-ranging agreement has been signed on 12th Feb 2010. This agreement has been signed between Indias Atomic Energy Commission chairman Mr. Srikumar Bannerjee, and Mr. Richard Stagg, the British high commissioner to India. Both the nations have been affirmative about positive aspects of the agreement.

This agreement is suppose to facilitate India to access to civilian nuclear energy though the country has refused to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Officially considered as the United States-India Nuclear Cooperation Approval and Nonproliferation Enhancement Act, this act prevented India to do any sort of Nuclear related collaborative efforts with the US for about 36 years from the date of its first nuclear bomb tests. It is indicative that a new relation between India and UK will develop after implication of the agreement.

It can be regarded that trade ties between two nations have increased and the trend indicates it will further rise in future. Trade terms have largely changed after India adopted the policy of open trade with liberalization policy. New Trade Theories are now practically getting implemented.

British Business Group or (BBG) is an outstanding place to develop business contacts remain keep up to date with the latest business opportunities and ideas. It is possible to maintain the business contacts and remain up to date about the latest business ideas.

It is the forum for British and Indian companies and investors to meet and exchange ideas. This can be also considered as the platform for networking in friendly and informal environment.

Similarly in Mumbai, the financial capital of India, BBG in Mumbai has more than 300 members, this includes top corporate firms, professional firms, subject matter experts and individuals. From blue chip companies of the United Kingdom to the potential investors, all accumulate. This reminds again of the success of New Trade Theory. The process of trading have smoothened,
The HYPERLINK httpwww.bbgmumbai.orgmembership.php t _selfmembership is definitely beneficial as it enables a company individual with a chance to promote them  gain business prospects. Moreover it provides an update about latest most relevant social, political  business issues. Besides, there are several committees and organizations that offer interactive areas for bridging the UK and India based investors.

It is expected that by the end of the year 2015, bilateral trade between UK and India will cross 40 billion dollars. In the year 2009 it has been about 12 billion dollars. The report forwarded by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) projects that a target for merchandise trade at 40 billion by 2015 with special importance on expanding services trade to 12 billion. In addition there will be special focus to pull up few other areas of operation and trade.

Global companies are now exploring emerging markets, and this since last few years it has been noticed that several UK based companies are sharing knowledge with their Indian counterparts. There are different ways of reaching a new market, bilateral trade is the basis of reaching a new market with the purpose of trade and explore new market. Political thinkers often opined that it might be a concept of Neo  colonialism. However, India and United Kingdom have fared well as trade partners in the recent past. India has liberalized but still in many aspects liberalization is in the nascent stage and the nation has miles to go in future. Adherence to the New Trade Theory, trade terms might be more favorable for India.

Broader trade policies of UK in brief

United Kingdom is a member of the seven OECD countries the New Trade Theory has been highly instrumental in shaping the enhanced trade policy of the nation. The industrial policy during the post Second World War phase has indeed helped the nation to be a prominent player in international trade.

Relative importance of post world war choices have been small, contribution remained of the pre- war contributions.

During the post war phase policy response to the post war internationalism has been affirmative. UK nurtured free trade, but in many aspects the nation acted as a protectionist.

On national industry of the United Kingdom the post war post war internationalism considerably weakened several industries and it has also let to low growth of several sectors. For this later the New Trade Theories have pushed the country better towards industrial growth. Relations with growing economies like India have further fostered the overall industrial growth.

In terms of wider context of decision making on industrial policies, the nation had strong institutions but it remained weak in terms of directing industries.

In the post war phase there has been several political influences on the industrial area and there has been a major stress for protection of the prevailing trade policies for greater benefit of the nation.
There has been a major shift in the policy and trade process after the Second World War. Not only in the United Kingdom, several European nations changed their trade policies. Fromfree trade to protectionism. This has been a major step. England was not an exception at that post war time.
Britain followed a politically capricious industrial policy and this is a typical character of a nation that faces war and incurs expenses.

For the sake of public interests several governments adopt some control over price, output and product quality. United Kingdom frames the strategy for attainment of the best developmental policies. Control of the monopoly power was prominent at that time as well. Later, after the implications of New Trade theory, things have improved a lot. There has been major issues related to trade and terms and United States as a nation followed strong trade policies after the war. This helped the nation to go ahead in the international trade.

Since July 1991 the new trade policy has been executed in India and since then the trade scenario with the UK has changed. It has been a historic policy change and the new trade policy has been highly effective. With the radical departure of the past industrial policies thing gave dramatically changed. Indian market conditions were suddenly not ready to accept the wide global ecomony and during the phase special steps were taken.

Priority was give to the exports instead of emphasizing the imports. There has been a change in the five years planning of the nation. Imports were limited at the same time in India but the market witnesses several shifts. In the 90s export considerably grew and the demand exceeded along with fall of price. During 90s tea export of India has been considerable. By following the New Trade Theories, it becomes much easier for the nations to export excess tea against other engineering product from the UK.

There have been several propositions related to the new economic reforms. The new market driven economy was not suitable for a country that followed separate model for decades. In 1990s there was a slowdown in global trade and as a result it is not difficult for India to achieve the trade policies that the international open market followed.

Indian production system was much advanced and finally it became easier for a country like India to endow resources to make trade terms with United Kingdom better. There were several conditions of success and India followed them successfully. To make the process of liberalization and new trade policies successful, India accumulate foreign capital. This helped the nation to meet the balance of payments and other payment difficulties.

Conclusion
There are several ways of initiating better trade terms between UK and India. With advancement of time those avenues are slowly opening up. Indian Economy is shining with the implementation of policies like liberalization and execution of trade and commerce basing upon the New Trade Theories. There are several ways trading being within the parameters of the new theory and both India and United Kingdom has been immensely benefited by following new theories of trade. India has been a British colony earlier and Britain is continuing trade terms with Indian people since last three hundred years (including the colonial era).

There have been ups and downs, highs and lows in the trade relations between India and Britain. But the trade continued over the decades. There are new theories that make trade ties better and substantial but India has been associated with Britain for trade and commerce and continued consistent trade.

This is now the time for United Kingdom to make the best uses of Indian knowledge if Information technology is concerned. There are several Indian companies that are locally registered for operating within the trading parameters of UK. This helps sectors like retail, bank, aviation, automobile, food processing etc to make the market better. At the same time India gets the best technological assistance by trading with Britain. In terms of making power generation tools and mechanical engineering UK based companies are performing well.

It can be said that the trade relations between India and the United Kingdom is much based upon the New Trade Theory. By supplementing imperfect competition and by considering better economies of scale both the nations have been immensely benefited. After complex analysis by the economists both the nations are following the profitable model of NTT.

The semiconductor industry has revolutionized the trade relations between United Kingdom and India. Large pools of talented Indian professionals are catering the requirements of the businesses of Britain. On the contrary with joint ownerships there has been a great change. Indian telecom service providers have collaborated with the UK based players to make the maximum benefits. So it can be well deduced that after liberalization and by utilizing the advantages of economies of scale both UK and India have gained a lot.

There still remain few governmental delays but in case of all diplomatic moves this exists. Different processes associated to governmental initiatives get delayed across the globe. Bureaucratic decision and validation of processes are constraints but these can be supplemented with enhanced initiatives to make the New Trade Theories more successful.

Economics Coursework

1. Given A country has a Current Account Surplus of 10 billion, a Financial Account Deficit of 6 billion and a balanced current account.
To Determine If the country runs a balance of payments deficit or surplus
Balance of payments (BOP) measures the net current account (CA), capital account and financial account balances. Current account balance   10 billion ( indicates a surplus), financial account balance  - 6 billion (- indicates a deficit) and capital account balance  0.
BOP  Current Account Balance  Capital Account Balance  Financial Account Balance
10 billion  0  (- 6 billion)  4 billion
Since the balance of payments appears with a positive sign, the country is running a balance of payments surplus.

2. To Determine
i. Countrys Exchange Rate Regime
ii. Whether Foreign Exchange Reserves are Rising or Falling

Answer
In a floating exchange rate system, an imbalance between demand and supply of currency in the Foreign Exchange Market is immediately corrected by a change in exchange rate. Consequently, a balance of payments deficit or surplus usually ceases to exist under a floating exchange rate regime. Consequently, the country is following a fixed exchange rate regime.

A balance of payments surplus is a transaction marked by purchase of foreign currency and assets. Since the country is running a balance of payments surplus, its foreign exchange reserves are rising.

3. To Determine Whether Central Bank is Selling or Purchasing Foreign Currency
The Central bank is buying foreign currency. A balance of payments surplus implies that net exports exceed net imports. Since the nation is running a surplus, it is receiving more foreign funds from trade and international investments than it is paying to the other country. With increased supply of foreign currency on FOREX, it is essential for the central bank to buy the excess foreign currency to prevent domestic currency appreciation. This is necessary for maintaining the fixed exchange rate value.

4. To Determine if Exchange rate is Good or Bad for the Country
Answer A fixed exchange rate regime has its advantages and disadvantages, depending upon the present economic climate of the country and the world. A major drawback of the fixed exchange rate regime is that foreign currency reserves can lose their value with inflation. Such has been the case with many nations that have fixed their currency value relative to US dollar. With inflating reserve currency, the central bank will need to invest capital that could be put to more constructive uses, to maintain their purchasing power in international markets. If the country lets its currency appreciate freely in the markets import costs will decline. Further, the country can rid itself of any negative inflationary outcomes caused by fixing domestic currency against a nation experiencing a high domestic inflation rate. A fixed exchange rate regime may also be preventing implementation of prudent monetary policies by constraining the monetary autonomy of the central bank. In the light of the aforementioned factors, a fixed exchange rate regime is bad for the country.
   
On the contrary, the fixed exchange rate regime is protecting exporters from the devastation caused by significant currency appreciation. If the country has been able to maintain the system with few currency devaluations and revaluations, the regime is successfully minimizing volatility, risk and instability. This promotes foreign trade and investment. Further, if the available foreign reserves are not imposing a significant threat on the governments expenditures and it can counter expected future balance of deficits well to maintain the credibility and advantages of the fixed rate system, then the fixed rate is good for the country. Lastly, if the domestic currency value is fixed relative to a stable currency or gold, the system may be more beneficial than damaging. Thus, the fixed rate regime will be good or bad for the nation contingent on the present domestic and international economic climate and trader and investor expectations.

5. Given UK pound was worth 2 a couple of years ago. At present pounds value oscillates between 1.60 and 1.70.
To Determine If Pound has Depreciated or Appreciated
Answer The value of pound has depreciated over the period of time. Currency depreciation implies that its value has fallen relative to foreign currency. Thus, one unit of depreciating currency can purchase fewer units of another currency. Since, it was possible to buy more dollars (2) with one pound a couple of years back than it is at present (160-1.70), it can be concluded that pound has depreciated in value over the considered time span.

6. Pros and Cons of a Flexible Exchange Rate Regime
A flexible exchange rate regime has multifarious advantages. Firstly, it allows the value of a currency to adjust in response to market conditions. This in turn removes or eliminates any imbalances in balance of payments. Secondly, in such systems there are no intervention costs. The government does not use its resources to buy and sell currency and can focus all its attention on domestic economic issues. Further, governments can freely choose their domestic policies. The flexible exchange rate regime automatically ensures correction of balance of payments disequilibrium that might result from policy implementations. The flexible rate regime also insulates a country from external economic events by ensuring that domestic currency is not tied to a high world inflation rate. It neutralizes the impact of external and real macroeconomic shocks and effect of inflation on competitiveness of exports. Cheaper export prices encourage competition.
   
On the negative side, regular currency value changes, characteristic of flexible exchange rate regimes, make planning difficult. Such a system makes trade and financial transactions more volatile and risky. This can deter trade and foreign investment transactions, traders and investors prefer predictability. Since the currency varies regularly, in response to demand and supply, speculation is encouraged which causes instability. Further, exchange rate variations without government intervention may be incapable of restoring equilibrium. Competitive devaluations facilitated by a flexible system may result in regional instability. Flexible exchange rate regimes can delay structural adjustments since price changes mask underlying system rigidities. Lastly, flexible exchange rate regime makes payment of internal and external debt unpredictable and can severely alter a countrys obligations to its disadvantage.

Application of International Trade Concepts Simulation

International business model entails trading between countries or business organizations on an international platform. Under this mode of business, services, capital, and goods are exchanged across international territories or boundaries. There are both positive and negative effects which international trade has on the economy of the United States of America (McKenzie 1994, pp. 12-192). The fiscal and the monetary policies which are always put into place always affect the countrys exchange rates in diverse ways. Indeed the simulation of the international trade brought to fore a number of issues which are of great concern.

Identified advantages of International Trade
In the simulation, there are quite a number of advantages that have been identified.  To begin with, it is evident that international trade enables different countries involved in it to fully concentrate their resources to the production of goods and provision of services in the areas in which they indeed have comparative advantage. Rather than each country struggling to produce all the services and goods that its citizens need, international trade offer the unique opportunity for each country to specialize in the production of the given goods and services and then import the rest. International trade leads to the reduction of opportunity costs of producing certain goods and services. The country concerned could also chose to import the goods and services from countries that enjoy the lowest opportunity costs.

Limitations of International Trade
From the simulation of the international trade, the fact that international trade would produce an opportunity for different countries to produce goods and services at lower cost posses great threats to other countries. Some countries which participate in the international trade exploit other members in the business through unfair low setting of the prices of the goods and services produced. Goods which are naturally assumed to be produced at lower costs by some countries could end up being sold at unreasonably high costs. Moreover, McKenzie (1994, pp. 12-192), argues that it is very evident that that lower marginal costs do not necessary translate to lower and competitive prices. Lower costs from other international markets also cause a lot of threats to the local business market. Local companies, according to the international trade concept simulation, normally face a lot of threats from unfair competition among diverse countries. Joshi (2009) believes that most local companies are at times forced to shut down due to the extremely lower-priced goods and services which floods to most local markets.

In addition to the above mentioned limitations of international trade, the fact that international trade raises a number of risks can never be ignored. Based on the studied international trade concepts simulation, companies in various companies which engage in international trade faces the risks of buyer insolvency, none acceptance challenge, credit risks, regulatory risks among different countries, and different methodologies and levels of government interventions in the trade.

Effects of International Trade On the U.S. Economy
The economy of the United States of America has in a number of ways been affected by the international trade. Even though the primary benefit of the trade to the country is the overall improvement of the United States of Americas economy, other effects do exist. Based on the argument of Jones (1981, pp. 78-174.), international trade has opened up new markets for the United States of Americas products and services to the international market all over the world. For instance, because of the international trade, the whole world normally uses Microsoft Windows, Intel microprocessors, the Warner Brothers movies, the Boeing 747s, and the Pfizer drugs (Samuelson2001, pp. 349-1214). This is however not a surprising issue due to the superiority of the United States of America in a number of fields which include aviation, technology, biotechnology, and entertainment. This is in direct contrast to what would have been if the United States of America would not have been involved in international trade.

Samuelson (2001, pp. 349-1214), in his analysis of international trade, concurs with the fact that constant fluctuation in the growth of the United States of Americas economy is partly controlled by the influence of the international trade. A boom in one business partners economy normally leads to a boom in the United States of Americas economy. Poor performance of the international markets also results in the subsequent decline in the performance of the United States of Americas economy. Exchange rates and trade control measures which are implemented at the international business forums always need to be adhered to by the U.S thus forcing its business market and the entire economy to be influenced by the same. However, some concepts are very dynamic in the international market. A shift in business partnership at the international market has, in most cases, left the United States of America on the losing end. The U.S has in the recent past been the greatest loser of international trade due to the negative ripple effects from other poor performing markets and the ever shifting of business alliances among countries in the business arena.

Effect of the Fiscal and the Monetary Policies on Exchange Rates
The changes in fiscal and the monetary policies have had serious effects to the exchange rates both within and outside the United States of America. The continued changes in the various fiscal and monetary policies have to a greater extent, from a U.S. point of view, negatively impacted the exchange rates (Jones 1981, pp. 78-174). Changes in the monetary policies such as the lending and borrowing rates, in relation to the performance of the international trade, has continued to lower the exchange rates. Fiscal and monetary policies changes lead to either an appreciation or a decline of the exchange rates. As a result, this normally causes imports and exports hence compelling a country to change its pricing. Changes in the monetary policies also influence the import control which normally include imports and charged quotas on goods. Exchange rates thus shifts based on the level of comparative advantage involved.

Points Emphasized In the Simulation and My Application of the Lessons to My Work Place
The key points from the reading assignment which were emphasized in the simulation include the vital role which a government should play in safeguarding the local market, the importance of international trade, the various dangers of the international trade which are normally ignored and, the fact that even though fiscal and monetary policies are crucial in the international trade, they should not be used to harm other parties in the business association. The four emphasized points basically imply that even though international trade is very fundamental to the growth of countries and the world economy, proper mechanisms should be put in place to safeguard vulnerable countries and to ensure fairness in the world market. Emphasis has been done through depiction of the dangers which the U.S faces within the world market.

To apply the many vital lessons learned from the simulation to my work place, Wells Fargo, I would work towards ensuring that this mortgage company understands the importance of specialization in the business market. I shall also reinforce to the top-level management the importance of broadening our business scope and ensuring that the challenges faced at the Wells Fargo are viewed and solved from an international perspective. From the assessment, the core lesson learnt is that international trade has a number of diverse challenges which ought to be addressed through collaboration of the dynamic stakeholders involved in the trade.

Conclusion
From the analysis of the international trade concepts simulation done, it is very evident that multinational corporations, business outsourcing, globalization through the usage of information technology, transportation, and industrialization all have great effects on the modern international trade practices.

Effect of Low Cost Low Price Policy on the Economy

In order to determine whether a low cost low price policy is good for an economy, it is essential to establish what factors are beneficial to the economy. These factors include individual and social well-being, greater employment, healthcare and wage benefits and lesser poverty. Based on these factors, a low cost low price policy is not good for the economy.
   
When firms opt for low cost pricing at the cost of worker wages and benefits, employee well-being is lowered. For instance, Wal-Mart offers its employees 12.4 lesser hourly wage than the average wage for retail worker and lower health care coverage than other retail firms (Miller, 2006). These working conditions violate wage laws, agreements about hours and conditions of work, and health and retirement plans (Goodman, 2006). With increase in size of corporations implementing low cost policy, number of people it negatively impacts also rises. Secondly, low cost policy is adopted by firms capable of mass production. Such firms have significant market influence, forcing competitors to lower costs by lowering wages. Additionally, small mom-and-pop industries that cannot keep pace with low prices of large corporations are forced to shut-down along with many other firms (Goetz, 2006, p. 212). This creates unemployment and lowers wages of employed, by creating an excess supply of labor over demand. Further, it depletes local entrepreneurial class, local leadership potential and destroys social capital or civic capacity (Goetz, 2006, p. 213), factors that can foster significant economic growth. Such has been the case with Wal-Mart. Despite lower prices, poverty rate in US has increased due to Wal-Marts low cost low price policy. Further, it imposes extra costs on tax payers due to increased eligibility for welfare payments imposed by low cost policy implementing firms like Wal-Mart (Goetz, 2006, p. 214). In the light of all this, it can be said that a low cost low price policy caused more harm to the economy than good and is, thus, not beneficial for economy.

Economic Growth and Recession

Economic Conditions of Brazil and Zimbabwe
Brazil is a country in the South American region characterized by one of the strongest growth rates not only in that region, but worldwide. Its economy is sustained by agriculture and the energy sector. Apart from this, it is blessed with a plethora of natural resources ranging from minerals to petroleum. This, in recent times, has helped it grow out of the effects of inflation experienced in the early to mid nineties. The effects of the inflation were reduced by the efforts of the then president through the development of policies that could see to it that the economy improved within a desired time frame. The GDP of Brazil currently stands at 1.482 trillion placing it at position eight in size of GDP worldwide. It comes in second after the USA in the wider Americas region. This is an economically free country driven by the policies of a country that considers its trade as free and fair. Purchasing Power Parity is 1.9trillion. Around 97million people are employed in the agriculture, service and industry sectors converting to 7 unemployment rates. 26 of the people live below poverty line in Brazil.

Zimbabwe, on the other hand, is a country whose economy has received the biggest battering from political instability leaving it with the highest inflation rates ever in the history of the world. Its GDP is placed at 1.925billion. Its economy, like most of those in Africa, is heavily supported by the agricultural sector. In addition to agriculture, it also has huge deposits of minerals like platinum. Platinum deposits are recorded as among the highest in the world. The surprising rates of inflation have driven the economy to a status of constant importation of goods as opposed to its previous strong record of exportation of agricultural products. The population is relatively very literate with literacy levels placed at 90. This is among the highest in Africa. Agriculture takes the hugest chunk in labor force placed at over 60. The stability that the current political dispensation has provided has reduced the effects of inflation so that the economy is now recording a growth rate for the first time in a decade. Despite the high literacy levels, unemployment is placed at slightly over eighty percent.
Appraisal of How Growth Theory can Explain Difference in the Economic Growth Rates

An appraisal done on the economic growth of Brazil shows one trend that the economy, according to Oreiro and Nakabashi (2007, 2), grows due to the exponential growth of exported goods. Immediately after the inflation of the early nineties, the exportation of petroleum products and agricultural products grew immensely. Growth theory suggests that the expansion of research in the scientific field enhances the growth of the economy. The growth and exponential expansion of research such as in the use of ethanol as clean fuel has led to cheaper and more environment-friendly combustion in industries. This implies that the agricultural sector has benefitted a big deal as more and more agricultural produce like sugar and corn are used in the production of this fuel. As such, the money drawn from these ventures has helped fund so many development projects.

Zimbabwe, on the other hand, has experienced zero growth in the scientific field. This is contrary to the effects of the high literacy levels. Madise (2009, 1) states that misappropriation of funds meant for critical issues such as scientific research hamper attempts to make the economy flourish. This is coupled with inconsistency in the agricultural sector after shifting from an exporter to importer of basic food commodities. Therefore, the standards of living have been affected as people are forced to struggle to make ends meet. This means that the government concerns itself more with providing the basic needs of the people than on expansion of research in the scientific field. Jovanovic (2000, 1) offers an explanation through which growth theory is not favored in Zimbabwe

Growth could begin only when hard work and business enterprises are free of heavy taxation, of social stigma and of other interference by government and church.

This gives us an idea of how the political instability in Zimbabwe has messed up the economy. In addition, price control that was abandoned recently contributed to the effects of hyperinflation that the Zimbabwe has experienced. (Data on these statistics presented in the appendix).

Hindrances to Growth of Brazils Economy
The growth of Brazils economy is so much based on perspectives similar to those experienced during the Agrarian and Industrial revolutions of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries where agriculture and technology was important for the expansion of economies. An effect could be that the farming might render the land derelict. Relying on agriculture is therefore not a solid solution. The president of Brazil, Lula da Silva (2009) opines that the use of protectionism during the just ended recession could have been lethargic. Protectionism through introduction of tariffs for imports would server important economic ties with relating countries. Tariffs would have been used to control the number of goods that enter the country or better still, the taxes paid could be raised so that funds could be collected to help fund the economy. Natural resources are also known not to last very long. The democratic government in Brazil, according to Przeworski and Limongi (1993, 51-69), could contribute to an economy that grows slowly. This is due to the socialist tendencies of democratic governments.

To offset this, the country needs to adopt policies that regulate tariffs on imports to a level that would not hurt the country from which goods are exported. In addition, the country needs to spread the dependence on agricultural produce to other areas too. This is due to the fact that the land might not be productive for eternity. Policies that affect the economies from the political arena need also to be introduced so that the economy does not rely a lot on the political goodwill of the political class.

The Hindrances to the Growth of Zimbabwe    
The employment rates in Zimbabwe are at an all time low. Pegged at a dismal twenty percent employment rate, the unemployed remain a very high eighty percent. This is one of the effects that could cause the economic growth to stagnate further. This is coupled with the onslaught of HIV AIDS on the masses. Brown (1997, 3) suggests that the workforce is the most affected due to them being in the sexually active bracket. This implies that the employable are at a high risk of being infected.

Inflation rates are high. The current government has managed to stop it but the effects are already very huge. Reliance on exports alone places the country in a risk of being manipulated by donors or any other section from which they draw their resources. Crenshaw, Ameen and Christenson (1997, 974-984) attribute slow economic growth to population explosion. Zimbabwe experienced this in the late eighties to the early nineties when their economy was rapidly growing. This they attribute to the diversion of interests to address issues affecting the population. To stop the stagnating economy, Zimbabwe should introduce policies that regulate and specify time intervals within which growth policies should work. The inflation could also be stopped if the government ceases the printing of money to cover the budgetary deficits. The population growth is not necessarily a bad thing but it should be regulated and aimed at the development of a strong working force. Importation should be regulated so that the country also involves in the production of goods while at the same time protecting the indigenous products.